About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 4286   document(s)s (0.067 sec)

Rows

<<  <  101 - 120  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4306 for skyscabnner.com pdf (175 KB)

example of typosquatting. Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. Respondent does not own any registered...goods or services nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. Further, in the present case the typosquatting nature of the...

2024-01-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3640 for corningf.com pdf (196 KB)

typosquatting” as the Respondent has added the letter “f” to the end of the famous CORNING trademark. This was an attempt on the part of the Respondent to...domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith, since: - It is well-settled that the practice of typosquatting is by itself evidence of bad...

2023-11-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1110 for clipw4sale.com, clipx4sale.com pdf (158 KB)

thereby misleading consumers. In addition, Complainant asserts that Respondent’s registration and use of typosquatting domain names is evidence of bad faith...Complainant. With no response from Respondent, this claim is undisputed. In addition, it is well settled that the practice of typosquatting constitutes obvious...

2024-05-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-2033 for sahıbınden.com html (17 KB)

the characters. In the Complainant’s view, this is a strong indication for typosquatting. Furthermore, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has...replacement of single letters – in particular if both letters are virtually and potentially very similar to each other – is commonly assessed as typosquatting...

2011-01-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1776 for directine.com html (15 KB)

Name is being used to direct Internet users to competing insurance websites. The Disputed Domain Name is an attempt at typosquatting. It has generally...letter “l” in “line”. It is well established that “typosquatting” can constitute confusing similarity ( Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft v. New York TV...

2016-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1857 for managebyq.com html (15 KB)

the Trade Mark. The letter “d” in “managed” is omitted. The Disputed Domain Name is a case of “typosquatting”, and is confusingly similar to the Trade...differs from the Trade Mark only by the omission of the letter “d” in “managed”. It is well established that “typosquatting” can constitute confusing...

2016-11-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1404 for wikkipedia.com html (17 KB)

disputed domain name is confusingly similar to this trademark. It is an example of typosquatting, and the Respondent is diverting users who are attempting to...disputed domain name in bad faith, as the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, through typosquatting, for commercial gain, Internet users to a...

2015-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2012-0038 for delta.co html (14 KB)

the click-through option. Respondent's decision to register is a form of typosquatting, designed to capture Internet users attempting to reach the...legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. Complainant alleges that Respondent, by registering the disputed domain name , has engaged in typosquatting...

2013-01-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2545 for saonfi.com html (16 KB)

called typosquatting, and that it is usually found by Panels to be a sign of confusion. The Complainant asserts that the reputation of the Complainant's...trademark ("typosquatting"); and (iv) visually the disputed domain name is so close to the Complainant's well-known SANOFI trademark that confusion is...

2017-02-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2359 for sanufi.com html (16 KB)

called typosquatting, which has been constantly confirmed by UDRP panels to indicate a likelihood of confusion. The Complainant asserts that the reputation...domain name any distinctive meaning; (iii) the disputed domain name is a deliberate misspelling of the Complainant’s SANOFI trademark (“typosquatting...

2017-02-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0711 for samclubs.com html (19 KB)

its “www.omegafind.com” website. The Complainant characterizes the Respondent’s conduct as “a classic case of typosquatting”, establishing bad faith...Respondent’s minor misspelling of the Complainant’s mark appears to be deliberate – a practice commonly referred to as “typosquatting”. 2 The Panel finds that...

2005-09-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-1045 for accompliablog.com, accompliadietpill.net, accompliadietpills.net, accompliafreesample.com, accompliasample.com, accompliasamples.com, acompliabroker.com, acompliadistribution.com, acompliadistributors.com, acompliafreesample.com, acompliaportal.com, acompliasamples.com ... html (16 KB)

practice of typosquatting. This produces domain names that are equally confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant has not licensed...months after the Complainant announced the launch of its product was further evidence of bad faith cybersquatting. Typosquatting is a bad faith way of...

2005-12-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1587 for myglorida.com, myhflorida.com, vendormyfloridamarketplace.com html (15 KB)

MYFLORIDA and MYFLORIDAMARKETPLACE. According to the Complainant, the disputed domain names and are examples of so-called typosquatting. Further, the disputed...contends that the disputed domain names and are examples of so-called typosquatting, which in itself constitutes bad faith. According to the Complainant, the...

2008-01-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-2305 for calvinklien.com html (15 KB)

example of “typosquatting,” i.e ., capitalizing on the near-identity between the Domain Name and the Complainants’ Mark. This is achieved, contend the...that are transposed: “i” and “e”. This is a classic instance of “typosquatting”—the practice of exploiting a trademark by creating a domain name with...

2016-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0777 for hummerts.com html (15 KB)

the difference between the domain names is the addition of the letter “s” . The Respondent engages in typosquatting, which by definition, renders a...registering the disputed domain name, engages in typosquatting by introducing a slight variation in the Complainant’s famous mark. The Respondent incorporated...

2006-08-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2013-0017 for tumblr.com.au html (13 KB)

it has been used to redirect Internet users to online gambling websites (through typosquatting). This is inconsistent with the Respondent’s business...the following: - the Respondent is typosquatting (the Disputed Domain Name wholly incorporates the Trade Mark); - the Respondent has used the Disputed...

2013-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0752 for sucessories.com html (16 KB)

the Respondent is engaged in typosquatting in order to divert Internet traffic to the Respondent's website, which features advertising links to other...typosquatting is presumptive if not conclusive evidence of registration of the disputed domain name in bad faith, and that the Respondent's use of the disputed...

2010-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-5390 for cornirng.com pdf (175 KB)

disputed domain name is considered as typosquatting, and therefore is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s CORNING trademarks. The Complainant contends...offering of goods or services. Furthermore, the Complainant alleges that engaging in typosquatting activities undermines a claim of legitimate interests or...

2024-02-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0232 for wwwcanadiantire.com html (18 KB)

Respondent has provided no explanation why it has chosen the Impugned Domain Name other than to "typosquat". It argues that a number of WIPO Administrative...Panel decisions have concluded that "typosquatting" results in an identical or confusingly similar domain name and is also evidence of bad faith. It cites...

2003-05-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1688 for hedgesevr.com html (9 KB)

Domain Name has been used and registered in bad faith because: the Domain Name constitutes typosquatting; there is no justification for the Domain Name...the impression of an association between the Parties; the Respondent simultaneously registered two further typosquatting domain names; and the...

2020-09-11 - Case Details