About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 4262   document(s)s (0.074 sec)

Rows

<<  <  81 - 100  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3708 for wwwdfds.com html (18 KB)

registered third party trademark rights in the term “wwwdfds”; Respondent’s intentional typosquatting targeting Complainant’s domain name and website; and...Asia, where Respondent resides; Respondent’s intentional typosquatting targeting Complainant’s domain name and website; and Respondent’s direction of the...

2022-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-4014 for pennlngtonslaw.com html (16 KB)

has rights. As stated above in Section 4, the Complainant owns a registered trademark for PENNINGTONS. This is a clear case of typosquatting. The...NameBrightPrivacy.com / Adam Grunwerg , WIPO Case No. D2021-3279 . Further, the replacement of the letter “i” by the letter “l” is a typical typosquatting tactic. This is...

2022-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0536 for wwwbicyclecasino.com html (16 KB)

further contends that the Respondent is engaging in typosquatting, relying on mistakes made by Internet users to direct Internet traffic intended for the...CASINO mark at the time of registration and that he had no right, title or interest, whatsoever, in the mark or domain name; and (iv)�typosquatting. B...

2006-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0928 for loreenamckennit.com, lorenamckennitt.com html (17 KB)

abusive Domain Name registration. Each of these elements is discussed below: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The practice of "typosquatting" consists in..."Loreena". These are typical "typosquatting" traps and undoubtedly confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trade mark. Therefore, the requirement of...

2004-02-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1013 for vanhuesen.com html (26 KB)

trademark rights. 2. The Respondent’s use of the Domain Name is a clear case of “typosquatting,” because this domain name differs from the Complainant’s...“o” and “r” represents typosquatting rendering domain name confusingly similar to trademark). Accordingly, the Complainant has proven the first element...

2018-07-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0361 for americanfund.com html (29 KB)

0568 . “Typosquatting” was not unknown in 1999, but if the disputed domain name was registered as a “typosquat” in 1999, that begs the question of why...mere removal of the letter “s” is not enough to avoid confusion, and appears to be mere typosquatting. Typosquatting is a practice by which “a registrant...

2011-05-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0843 for whitehall-speciatlies.com html (21 KB)

of the letters “l” and t” in the word “specialties.” Complainant alleges the Domain Name is “typosquatting” and is not sufficiently distinguishable...confusingly similar Domain Name that constitutes typosquatting of Complainant’s WHITEHALL SPECIALTIES Mark is evidence of bad faith registration of a domain...

2021-06-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0716 for whitehall-specialites.com, whitehall-speciallties.com, whitehall-specialtes.com html (28 KB)

the Domain Names are “typosquatting” and are not sufficiently distinguishable from Complainant’s WHITEHALL SPECIALTIES Mark. Complainant further...confusingly similar Domain Names that constitute typosquatting of Complainant’s WHITEHALL SPECIALTIES Mark is evidence of bad faith registration of a domain...

2021-06-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1082 for aftonchimecal.com html (16 KB)

domain name does not serve to differentiate it from the AFTON CHEMICAL trademark, and that the disputed domain name is a classic example of “typosquatting...Complainant’s employees for purposes of soliciting fraudulent payment. The Complainant also argues that the practice of “typosquatting” has been held under the...

2019-07-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2019-0009 for creditm-mutuel.co html (18 KB)

make a difference. It rather constitutes a typosquatting of its CREDIT MUTUEL trademark, leading to a confusing similarity. The Complainant contends that...interests. The Complainant adds that considering its core banking activity, it is impossible that the Respondent might have used this typosquatting disputed...

2019-05-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4506 for bte365.com pdf (107 KB)

the disputed domain name contains “bte” rather than “bet”. This is a clear example of typosquatting, as the inversion of letters is a common form of...The Complainant’s BET365 trademark is recognizable in the disputed domain name. It is well established that where there is “typosquatting”, the domain...

2023-02-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2013-0017 for tumblr.com.au html (13 KB)

it has been used to redirect Internet users to online gambling websites (through typosquatting). This is inconsistent with the Respondent’s business...the following: - the Respondent is typosquatting (the Disputed Domain Name wholly incorporates the Trade Mark); - the Respondent has used the Disputed...

2013-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1404 for wikkipedia.com html (17 KB)

disputed domain name is confusingly similar to this trademark. It is an example of typosquatting, and the Respondent is diverting users who are attempting to...disputed domain name in bad faith, as the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, through typosquatting, for commercial gain, Internet users to a...

2015-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-2305 for calvinklien.com html (15 KB)

example of “typosquatting,” i.e ., capitalizing on the near-identity between the Domain Name and the Complainants’ Mark. This is achieved, contend the...that are transposed: “i” and “e”. This is a classic instance of “typosquatting”—the practice of exploiting a trademark by creating a domain name with...

2016-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1776 for directine.com html (15 KB)

Name is being used to direct Internet users to competing insurance websites. The Disputed Domain Name is an attempt at typosquatting. It has generally...letter “l” in “line”. It is well established that “typosquatting” can constitute confusing similarity ( Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft v. New York TV...

2016-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1857 for managebyq.com html (15 KB)

the Trade Mark. The letter “d” in “managed” is omitted. The Disputed Domain Name is a case of “typosquatting”, and is confusingly similar to the Trade...differs from the Trade Mark only by the omission of the letter “d” in “managed”. It is well established that “typosquatting” can constitute confusing...

2016-11-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2545 for saonfi.com html (16 KB)

called typosquatting, and that it is usually found by Panels to be a sign of confusion. The Complainant asserts that the reputation of the Complainant's...trademark ("typosquatting"); and (iv) visually the disputed domain name is so close to the Complainant's well-known SANOFI trademark that confusion is...

2017-02-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2359 for sanufi.com html (16 KB)

called typosquatting, which has been constantly confirmed by UDRP panels to indicate a likelihood of confusion. The Complainant asserts that the reputation...domain name any distinctive meaning; (iii) the disputed domain name is a deliberate misspelling of the Complainant’s SANOFI trademark (“typosquatting...

2017-02-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0979 for chstroulette.com html (15 KB)

Mark and is therefore considered confusingly similar to the Trade Mark. This is a typical example of typosquatting, a deliberate misspelling of a trade...complainant's trade mark, UDRP panels will typically find bad faith on the part of the respondent. Typosquatting itself has been taken as evidence of bad faith...

2018-06-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1087 for arceloremittal.com html (14 KB)

ARCELORMITTAL and, thus, constitutes an unlawful act of “typosquatting”. Moreover, the addition of the gTLD “.com” does not change the similarity between the...typosquatting” and cannot rule out the overall confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s ARCELORMITTAL trademark as this...

2018-07-27 - Case Details