About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Industry Representatives Urge Cheaper PatentProtection

Geneva, May 8, 2000
Press Updates UPD/2000/97

A panel of leading representatives of industry has urged the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and its 175 member states to explore ways of reducing the costs of intellectual property protection. The Industry Advisory Commission (IAC) underlined that affordable intellectual property protection is a key factor in securing socio-economic development and promoting widespread use of the intellectual property system.

Meeting under the auspices of WIPO in Geneva on May 4 and 5, 2000, the IAC adopted a resolution urging WIPO member states to explore ways to lower the costs of obtaining and maintaining intellectual property protection. In another resolution, the IAC, a body that reflects on the role of WIPO from the perspective of industry, also called on WIPO to take the lead in addressing questions concerning the patentability of biotechnology. The resolutions will be presented to the annual meeting of WIPO member states in September.

The IAC urged WIPO member states to adopt a more comprehensive approach to reducing the cost of obtaining and maintaining intellectual property protection in multiple countries. The Commission advocated a number of medium and long term measures, namely:

  • the harmonization of substantive patent law in order to facilitate greater mutual recognition of search and examination results by patent offices
  • further exploratory work on the possible introduction of a PCT certificate of patentability and work, in the long term, on the development of the legal framework for a world patent;
  • the adoption of a general principle to eliminate barriers (e.g. fees, unreasonable delays and burdensome procedures) to obtaining and maintaining intellectual property protection at a reasonable cost.

The IAC also supported the development of a set of best practices regarding the use of intellectual property fees at the national and regional levels. Such practices include:

  • the principle that filing, maintenance and other fees derived by intellectual property offices should be used exclusively for purposes related to intellectual property;
  • the principle that, in order to lower barriers to access to patent protection, the filing fee should not exceed a designated percentage of the total fees that would be payable if a patent were granted and maintained until expiration of the patent term.

Following an extensive debate on the question, the IAC also called upon WIPO to take a lead role in urgently suggesting the appropriate application of patentability standards in the field of biotechnology.

Copies of the resolutions are attached.

This was the third session of the IAC, which was established in the context of efforts by WIPO Director General, Dr. Kamil Idris, to take account of the broadest range of opinions in the framework of the Organization's policy making and program planning. The views from industry are important to WIPO as the private sector benefits directly from the Organization's services. The commission identifies and reviews issues that may need to be dealt with by WIPO from the specific viewpoint of industry and the market sector. The IAC, whose members sit in their personal capacities, has a purely advisory role.

For additional information, please contact the Media Relations and Public Affairs Section at WIPO: