About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Office Order No. 13-124, Series of 2013, Amended Rules of Procedure for the Asean Patent Examination Cooperation ( ASPEC) Program, Philippines

Back
Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2013 Dates Entry into force: July 15, 2013 Type of Text Implementing Rules/Regulations Subject Matter Patents (Inventions), Enforcement of IP and Related Laws

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Office Order No. 13-124, Series of 2013, Amended Rules of Procedure for the Asean Patent Examination Cooperation ( ASPEC) Program        
 
Download PDF open_in_new
 Amended Rules of Procedure for the Asean Patent Examination Cooperation (ASPEC) Program

OFFICE ORDER NO. .13 - 124 ; III Series 0(2013

AMENDED RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ASEAN PATENT EXAMINATION COOPERAnON (ASPEClI'ROGRAM

Section I. Objective

The purpose of ASPEC is to share search and examination results among participating ASEAN Member State (AMS) IP Offices. This will not only allow patent applicants making a request under ASPEC in any of the participating offices to obtain corresponding patents faster and more efficiently. it will also help to ease the workload of the examiners, reduce work, increase turnaround time; and generate better quality search and examination repoft.

Section 2. Coverage

The ASPEC program covers applications for patent filed in two or more AMS II' Offices. The II' Office where the application is first filed is herein referred to as "first IP Office" and the subsequent IP Office where the application is filed is herein referred to as "second II> Office".

Section 3. Filing an ASPEC Request by Applicant - The Applicant himself or through the Local Agent submits to the AMS second IP Office:

a) A completed ASPEC Request Form (herein attached as Annex A); b) The Search and Exam Rep0l1 from the AMS first IP Office, and c) A copy of the claims referred to in (b).

All documents submitted for the purposes of ASPEC must be in English.

Section 4. When to File the ASPEC Request- The ASPEC Request Form shall be submitted on the same day as the Request for Substantive Examination is filed.

Section 5. English Translation Required - If the Search and Exam Report is not in English, then either (i) the Applicant arranges to submit an English translation of the ASPEC, or where preferred or if in accordance with the procedures and practice of the AMS IP Offices concerned, (ii) the AMS second IP Office contacts the AMS first II> Office directly to obtain an English translation of the ASPEC documents. The translation may be done by either the AMS first lP Office or the Applicant himself or through his Local Agent.

The English translation of any ASPEC documents submitted may need to be verified according to the requirements of tile AMS second IP Office.

Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

Intellectual Property Center, 28 Upper McKinley Road, McKinley Hill Town Center Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City 1634 Philippines

T: +632-2386300 • F: +632-5539480 • www.ipophil.gov.ph

Pagelof2

Section 6. Ejfect of Incomplete ASPEC Documenls - If the AMS second IP Orlice determines that any ASPEC document submitted by the Applicant is not complete, the AMS second IP Oflice shall inform the Applicant to submit that document.

In the AMS first IP OCfice, the patent application shall proceed accordingly.

Section 7. Use of ASPEC DOClimenls in Examination - The Patent Examiner in the AMS second IP Oflice proceeds to conduct the examination and can refer to the ASPEC documents only as additional reference.

Section 8. Filling out (he ASPEC Survey Form - The Patent Examiner in the AMS second IP Office shall complete the ASPEC survey form and submit a copy to the AMS first IP Office and to the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore.

Section 9. Ejfeclivily - These rules of procedure shall take effect on July 15,20 t3.

For compliance.

ATTY.RJC~B~CAFLOR Director General

REcmm BY.tJ . IPO PHl '13J[;·~~"B

Page 2 of2


Legislation Amends (1 text(s)) Amends (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s))
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. PH111