About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015, Australia

Back Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2015 Dates Adopted: July 26, 2015 Entry into force: June 27, 2015 Type of Text Main IP Laws Subject Matter Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights), Enforcement of IP and Related Laws Notes The notification by Australia to the WTO under article 63.2 of TRIPS states:
'The Act amends the Copyright Act 1968 to enable the owner of a copyright to apply to the Federal Court of Australia ('Federal Court') for an order requiring a Carriage Service Provider (CSP) to block access to an online location that has the primary purpose of infringing copyright or facilitating the infringement of copyright.
The Act provides that copyright owners are able to apply directly to the Federal Court for an injunction to disable access to an infringing online location, without having to first establish the CSP's liability for copyright infringement or authorisation of copyright infringement. This judicial process is more efficient and avoids implicating CSPs unnecessarily.
The injunction power only applies to online locations operated outside Australia.
The Court has discretion to take into account a number of factors before granting an injunction.
These factors include:
• the flagrancy of the infringement or its facilitation;
• whether disabling access to the online location is a proportionate response in the circumstances;
• the impact on any person likely to be affected by the grant of the injunction; and
• whether it is in the public interest to disable access to the online location.
The factors that the Federal Court of Australia may take into account before granting an injunction to disable access to an overseas infringing online location set an intentionally high threshold test for satisfaction by the Court. The purpose of these changes is to allow a specific and targeted remedy to prevent those online locations which flagrantly disregard the rights of copyright owners from facilitating access to infringing copyright content.
The injunction power operates as a no-fault remedy. It is not intended to affect existing laws on infringement, copyright exceptions or limitations, authorisation liability or any of the safe harbour conditions. Furthermore, the Court granting an injunction would not create a presumption that the CSP has infringed copyright nor authorised the infringement of copyright.'

Available Materials
Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015        

Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015

No. 80, 2015

An Act to amend the Copyright Act 1968, and for related purposes

 

Contents

1 Short title

2 Commencement

3 Schedules

Schedule 1—Amendments

Copyright Act 1968

 

Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015

No. 80, 2015

 

An Act to amend the Copyright Act 1968, and for related purposes

[Assented to 26 June 2015]

The Parliament of Australia enacts:

1 Short title

This Act may be cited as the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015.

2 Commencement

This Act commences on the day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

3 Schedules

Legislation that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms.

Schedule 1—Amendments

Copyright Act 1968

1 After section 115

Insert:

115A Injunctions against carriage service providers providing access to online locations outside Australia

(1) The Federal Court of Australia may, on application by the owner of a copyright, grant an injunction referred to in subsection (2) if the Court is satisfied that:

(a) a carriage service provider provides access to an online location outside Australia; and

(b) the online location infringes, or facilitates an infringement of, the copyright; and

(c) the primary purpose of the online location is to infringe, or to facilitate the infringement of, copyright (whether or not in Australia).

(2) The injunction is to require the carriage service provider to take reasonable steps to disable access to the online location.

Parties

(3) The parties to an action under subsection (1) are:

(a) the owner of the copyright; and

(b) the carriage service provider; and

(c) the person who operates the online location if, but only if, that person makes an application to be joined as a party to the proceedings.

Service

(4) The owner of the copyright must notify:

(a) the carriage service provider; and

(b) the person who operates the online location;

of the making of an application under subsection (1), but the Court may dispense, on such terms as it sees fit, with the notice required to be sent under paragraph (b) if the Court is satisfied that the owner of the copyright is unable, despite reasonable efforts, to determine the identity or address of the person who operates the online location, or to send notices to that person.

Matters to be taken into account

(5) In determining whether to grant the injunction, the Court may take the following matters into account:

(a) the flagrancy of the infringement, or the flagrancy of the facilitation of the infringement, as referred to in paragraph (1)(c);

(b) whether the online location makes available or contains directories, indexes or categories of the means to infringe, or facilitate an infringement of, copyright;

(c) whether the owner or operator of the online location demonstrates a disregard for copyright generally;

(d) whether access to the online location has been disabled by orders from any court of another country or territory on the ground of or related to copyright infringement;

(e) whether disabling access to the online location is a proportionate response in the circumstances;

(f) the impact on any person, or class of persons, likely to be affected by the grant of the injunction;

(g) whether it is in the public interest to disable access to the online location;

(h) whether the owner of the copyright complied with subsection (4);

(i) any other remedies available under this Act;

(j) any other matter prescribed by the regulations;

(k) any other relevant matter.

Affidavit evidence

(6) For the purposes of the proceedings, section 134A (affidavit evidence) applies as if the reference in paragraph 134A(f) to a particular act included a reference to a class of acts.

Rescinding and varying injunctions

(7) The Court may:

(a) limit the duration of; or

(b) upon application, rescind or vary;

an injunction granted under this section.

(8) An application under subsection (7) may be made by:

(a) any of the persons referred to in subsection (3); or

(b) any other person prescribed by the regulations.

Costs

(9) The carriage service provider is not liable for any costs in relation to the proceedings unless the provider enters an appearance and takes part in the proceedings.

2 Paragraphs 119(a) and 120(1)(b)

After “115”, insert “or 115A”.

3 Section 131A

Before “The”, insert “(1)”.

4 At the end of section 131A

Add:

(2) Despite subsection 39(2) of the Judiciary Act 1903, the Supreme Court of a State or Territory does not have jurisdiction in relation to applications under section 115A of this Act (injunctions against carriage service providers providing access to online locations outside Australia).

5 At the end of section 131D

Add “(other than section 115A)”.

 

[Minister’s second reading speech made in—

House of Representatives on 26 March 2015

Senate on 18 June 2015]

(56/15)

Legislation Amends (1 text(s)) Amends (1 text(s)) WTO Document Reference
IP/N/1/AUS/7
IP/N/1/AUS/C/16
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. AU413