About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ027-j

Back

Rehema Michael Sanga, Wilfred Jumanne Mwazini and Samwel Jumanne Mwazini Trading as Mwasare Investment v Beidersdorf AG Company, Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 160 of 2013, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Rehema Michael Sanga, Wilfred Jumanne Mwazini and Samwel Jumanne Mwazini Trading as Mwasare Investment v Beidersdorf AG Company, Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 160 of 2013, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Makaramba, J.

Date of Ruling: March 19, 2014

Facts

The application for registration of a trade mark was filed at the Registry of Trade and Service Marks. A notice of opposition to the registration was filed. One of the applicants preferred the matter be adjudicated by another person, such as the Deputy Registrar, instead of the Registrar. The Registrar found the opposition proceedings to be complex; hence, he decided to refer the matter to the High Court pursuant to section 49 of the Trade and Service Mark Act [Cap. 326 R.E. 2002].

Holdings

(i) The Registrar has discretionary powers to refer a matter to court for determination.

(ii) The Registrar may exercise such discretion where it appears to him that, the matter to be decided by the Registrar involves a point of law or is of unusual importance or complexity, although the law does not give any directions as to what may amount to "a matter of unusual importance or complexity."

(iii) Before the Registrar may refer such a matter to court, he has to give notice to the parties.

(iv) The request for recusal of the Registrar from handling the opposition proceedings to the registration of the trade mark does not amount to a matter of unusual importance or complexity.

Decision

(i) The application for reference to this court by the Registrar was misconceived and should be struck out because the Registrar correctly exercised its discretion by determining that this matter did not meet the “unusual importance or complexity” criteria.

(ii) The Registrar of Trade and Service Marks was ordered to continue with the hearing and determination of the opposition proceedings according to the law.