About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Belize

BZ001-j

Back

Claim No. 873 of 2010; Claim No. 896 of 2010

The applicant filed an appeal (of two decisions) following the ruling of the instant court which was asked to determine the validity of a registered trademark by the first defendant.

Despite both parties agreeing to amend the claim and there being no need therefore for the court to make a pronouncement on the decision of the Deputy Registrar of the Belize Intellectual Property Office (BELIPO) to grant trademark registration to the first defendant, the trial judge ordered that registration was invalid as it was contrary to s. 37(4) of the Trade Marks Act, Chap. 257 (“the Act”).

The argument was that opposition to the registration of the trademark was abandoned and the Deputy Registrar proceeded to grant the registration of the mark. The instant court was of the view, that there was still an obligation on the Deputy Registrar to comply with s. 37(4) of the Act even where the opposition was discontinued.

The Supreme Court noted that it was the duty of the first defendant to prove that the registration was proper and legal as the instant court was (a) entitled to make the order according to the s. 28 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act and under the Supreme Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 and (b) would have been neglecting in its duty and possibly keeping the door open for future litigation if it did not decide on the question of trademark validity.

The application for leave was denied as the applicant failed to show that an error was made, as required in the case of James Wang v Atlantic Insurance Co. Ltd. (Action No. 114 of 1988).

Cases referred: James Wang v. Atlantic Insurance Co. Ltd. (Action No. 114 of 1988); Corozal Timber Company Limited v Daniel Moreno No. 280 of 2009