About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Kingdom

GB070-j

Back

2024 WIPO IP Judges Forum Informal Case Summary – High Court of England and Wales (Patents Court), United Kingdom [2024]: Lenovo Group Ltd. and Ors v InterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors, [2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2024 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

 

Session 8: Cross-border Proceedings

 

High Court of England and Wales (Patents Court), United Kingdom [2024]: Lenovo Group Ltd. and Ors v InterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors, [2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)

 

Date of judgment: March 21, 2024

Issuing authority: High Court of England and Wales, Patents Court

Level of the issuing authority: First Instance

Type of procedure: Judicial (Civil)

Subject matter: Patents (Inventions)

Plaintiff: Lenovo Group Limited and others

Defendant: InterDigital Technology Corporation and others

Keywords: SEP patents, FRAND obligations, ETSI IPR policy, Proceedings to influence foreign proceedings, International comity

 

Basic facts: InterDigital has a portfolio of telecoms SEPs.  It brought infringement proceedings in Germany against Lenovo.  Lenovo brought a claim in the UK alleging that it was entitled to an interim FRAND license to the InterDigital Portfolio.  InterDigital resisted the license on a number of grounds, including that the real effect of a decision that there was an interim license would be felt in Germany and not in the UK.

 

Held: On the facts, the Court was not satisfied that the interim license would be FRAND.  However, the Court held that in any case (i.e., even if the interim license was FRAND), the benefit to Lenovo in the UK proceedings would be small, and the real goal of Lenovo was to obtain a decision that would affect the German proceedings.  The Court determined that it would be inappropriate to try to influence the German proceedings, and it was for the German courts to decide how to deal with FRAND cases that came before them. 

 

Relevant holdings in relation to cross-border proceedings: The judgment of the Court addresses the use of declarations in one territory to influence proceedings in another.

                                                                                      

Relevant legislation: None.