Propiedad intelectual Formación en PI Respeto por la PI Divulgación de la PI La PI para... La PI y… La PI en… Información sobre patentes y tecnología Información sobre marcas Información sobre diseños industriales Información sobre las indicaciones geográficas Información sobre las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Recursos de PI Informes sobre PI Protección por patente Protección de las marcas Protección de diseños industriales Protección de las indicaciones geográficas Protección de las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Solución de controversias en materia de PI Soluciones operativas para las oficinas de PI Pagar por servicios de PI Negociación y toma de decisiones Cooperación para el desarrollo Apoyo a la innovación Colaboraciones público-privadas Herramientas y servicios de IA La Organización Trabajar con la OMPI Rendición de cuentas Patentes Marcas Diseños industriales Indicaciones geográficas Derecho de autor Secretos comerciales Academia de la OMPI Talleres y seminarios Observancia de la PI WIPO ALERT Sensibilizar Día Mundial de la PI Revista de la OMPI Casos prácticos y casos de éxito Novedades sobre la PI Premios de la OMPI Empresas Universidades Pueblos indígenas Judicatura Recursos genéticos, conocimientos tradicionales y expresiones culturales tradicionales Economía Financiación Activos intangibles Igualdad de género Salud mundial Cambio climático Política de competencia Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Tecnologías de vanguardia Aplicaciones móviles Deportes Turismo PATENTSCOPE Análisis de patentes Clasificación Internacional de Patentes ARDI - Investigación para la innovación ASPI - Información especializada sobre patentes Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas Madrid Monitor Base de datos Artículo 6ter Express Clasificación de Niza Clasificación de Viena Base Mundial de Datos sobre Dibujos y Modelos Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Internacionales Base de datos Hague Express Clasificación de Locarno Base de datos Lisbon Express Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas para indicaciones geográficas Base de datos de variedades vegetales PLUTO Base de datos GENIE Tratados administrados por la OMPI WIPO Lex: leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Normas técnicas de la OMPI Estadísticas de PI WIPO Pearl (terminología) Publicaciones de la OMPI Perfiles nacionales sobre PI Centro de Conocimiento de la OMPI Informes de la OMPI sobre tendencias tecnológicas Índice Mundial de Innovación Informe mundial sobre la propiedad intelectual PCT - El sistema internacional de patentes ePCT Budapest - El Sistema internacional de depósito de microorganismos Madrid - El sistema internacional de marcas eMadrid Artículo 6ter (escudos de armas, banderas, emblemas de Estado) La Haya - Sistema internacional de diseños eHague Lisboa - Sistema internacional de indicaciones geográficas eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediación Arbitraje Determinación de expertos Disputas sobre nombres de dominio Acceso centralizado a la búsqueda y el examen (CASE) Servicio de acceso digital (DAS) WIPO Pay Cuenta corriente en la OMPI Asambleas de la OMPI Comités permanentes Calendario de reuniones WIPO Webcast Documentos oficiales de la OMPI Agenda para el Desarrollo Asistencia técnica Instituciones de formación en PI Apoyo para COVID-19 Estrategias nacionales de PI Asesoramiento sobre políticas y legislación Centro de cooperación Centros de apoyo a la tecnología y la innovación (CATI) Transferencia de tecnología Programa de Asistencia a los Inventores (PAI) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED de la OMPI Consorcio de Libros Accesibles Consorcio de la OMPI para los Creadores WIPO Translate Conversión de voz a texto Asistente de clasificación Estados miembros Observadores Director general Actividades por unidad Oficinas en el exterior Ofertas de empleo Adquisiciones Resultados y presupuesto Información financiera Supervisión
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Leyes Tratados Sentencias Consultar por jurisdicción

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX029-j

Atrás

Court of Justice of the Andean Community [2021]: Preliminary Ruling 476-IP-2019

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 2: Emerging Issues in Industrial Designs

Court of Justice of the Andean Community [2021]: Preliminary Ruling 476-IP-2019

Date of judgment: Issued on September 10, 2021; published on September 10, 2021 (Official Gazette of the Cartagena Agreement N° 4336)
Issuing authority: Court of Justice of the Andean Community
Level of the issuing authority: Final Instance
Type of procedure: Judicial (Administrative)
Subject matter: Industrial Designs; Trademarks
Plaintiff: Crocs Inc.
Defendant: Evacol S.A.S.
Keywords: Andean law, Preliminary ruling, Industrial property, Non-traditional trademarks. Industrial design, Three-dimensional trademark

Basic facts: Crocs Inc. (Crocs) was the owner of the following three-dimensional trademark consisting of a clog-shaped rubber shoe:

Evacol S.A.S. (Evacol) was the owner of a registered industrial design on a model of clog-type rubber show, as shown below. It had traded products that were similar to those sold by Crocs for a number of years prior to the registration of the three-dimensional trademark by Crocs.

Held: The Andean Court does not resolve the specific case. This regional court interprets Andean law with the purpose of guiding the national judge, who must resolve the controversy raised in domestic law by applying the Andean Court´s interpretation of the applicable supranational law.

Relevant holdings in relation to emerging issues in industrial designs: Relevant holdings in relation to emerging issues in industrial designs: The legal criteria for determining the likelihood of confusion between an industrial design and a three-dimensional trademark are as follows:

1. It is possible for a three-dimensional creation to be protected by both an industrial design (because it is novel) and by a three-dimensional trademark (because it is distinctive). It is also possible that, regardless of the diligence or lack thereof exercised by industrial property offices, rights in an industrial design and a three-dimensional trademark are held by different owners, even when consisting in a similar object or product. If it is possible that a three-dimensional creation can be protected by both an industrial design (novel) and by a three-dimensional trademark (distinctive), it is also possible that both industrial property rights belong to different owners. Also, in theory, and regardless of the diligence or lack thereof of the industrial property offices, it is possible one person owns an industrial design and another one owns a three-dimensional trademark, with both industrial property rights falling on about a similar object or product

2. If the industrial design was registered first and products covered by said design have been traded on the market, it might seem strange that a three-dimensional trademark that is identical or similar to the aforementioned design is later registered, since the existence of the aforesaid products would introduce doubts about the necessary “distinctiveness” of the brand. If the registration of the three-dimensional trademark was first, it would also be strange if an industrial design identical or similar to said trademark is subsequently registered, since the existence of this trademark and the products distinguished by it in the market would make compliance with the “novelty” requirement of industrial design impossible.

3. Nonetheless, in some circumstances, it may arise that both an industrial design and a three-dimensional trademark relating to identical or similar goods are registered to different owners, regardless of the diligence or lack thereof of the IP office.

4. The risk of confusion between both industrial property rights could appear, for example, if a consumer, purchasing a product covered by the industrial design of company “A”, considers that this product has been manufactured by a company that sells similar products, but covered by a three-dimensional trademark registered in favor of company “B”. In other words, consumer choice in the market could be affected due to confusion regarding the business origin of a certain product.

5. In the event of a conflict between an industrial design and a three-dimensional trademark, in the sense that there is a likelihood of confusion in relation to the business origin of the products that are sold in the market and that are covered by both industrial property rights but held by different right-holders, the oldest registration must be priorized, in application of the “first in time, first in right” principle(prior in tempore, potior in iure).

Relevant legislation:
Decision No. 486 Establishing the Common Industrial Property Regime
(this Andean law is applicable in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru)