À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Décret d'application de la loi pour un étiquetage et une publicité corrects (décret présidentiel n° 16430 du 30 juin 1999, modifié jusqu'au décret présidentiel n° 21349 du 12 mars 2009), République de Corée

Retour
Texte remplacé  Accéder à la dernière version dans WIPO Lex
Détails Détails Année de version 2009 Dates Entrée en vigueur: 1 juillet 1999 Émis: 30 juin 1999 Type de texte Lois en rapport avec la propriété intellectuelle Sujet Marques, Concurrence Notes Cette version consolidée du décret d'application de la loi du 12 mars 2009 pour un étiquetage et une publicité corrects inclut tous les amendements de 2004 jusqu'au 2009 (voir les articles 2, 17 et 18 pour les dernières modifications apportées par le décret présidentiel n° 21349 du 12 mars 2009).

Ce décret met en œuvre, entre autres, les dispositions spécifiques concernant l'étiquetage et les pratiques déloyales (article 3), et les secrets d'affaires (article 6), qui sont prescrites en vertu de la loi pour un étiquetage et une publicité corrects.

Selon l'addendum du présent décret, le décret présidentiel n° 21349 entrera en vigueur le jour de sa promulgation, soit le 12 mars 2009.

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais Enforcement Decree of the Fair Labeling and Advertising Act (Presidential Decree No. 16430 of June 30, 1999, as amended up to Presidential Decree No. 21349 of March 12, 2009)        

Enforcement Decree of the Fair Labeling and Advertising Act

March 12, 2009

(Only the Korean text is/are authentic)

Korea Fair Trade Commission

Enforcement Decree of the Fair Labeling and Advertising Act [Enforced 3-12-2009]

[Presidential Decree No. 21349, Partially Amended 3-19-2009]

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Article 1 (Purpose) The purpose of this Decree is to prescribe matters delegated by the Fair Labeling

and Advertising Act and other necessary matters for the enforcement of the Act.<Amended 3-29-

2006>

Article 2 (Methods of Advertising)

“Other methods specified by a presidential decree” in Article 2-(2) of the Fair Labeling and

Advertising Act (hereafter referred to as “Act”) shall mean the use of the following media and

methods. <Amended 3-29-2006, 3-12-2009>

1. leaflets, pamphlets, samples or admission tickets

2. the Internet or computers

3. posters, signboards, neon signs, advertising balloons or electronic bulletin boards

4. video recordings, musical records, books, periodicals, movies or theatrical plays

5. other products

6. other media or methods comparable to those listed in subparagraph (1) or (5)

Article 3 (Unfair Labeling and Advertising Practices)

(1) “False or exaggerated labeling or advertising” mentioned in Article 3-(1)-1 of the Act shall mean

labeling or advertising practices which misrepresent or exaggerate facts.

(2) “Deceptive labeling or advertising” mentioned in Article 3-(1)-2 of the Act shall mean labeling or

advertising practices which conceal or understate facts.

(3) “Unfair comparative labeling or advertising” mentioned in Article 3-(1)-3 of the Act shall mean a

practice in which a business operator or trade association (hereafter referred to as “Business Operator,

etc.”) labels or advertises himself/herself/itself or his/her/its product or service (hereafter referred

to as “Product, etc.”) as superior to another Business Operator, etc. or another Business Operator’s

Product, etc. without specifying the subject of, and criteria for, comparison or presenting objective

facts in support of such comparisons.

(4) “Slanderous labeling or advertising” mentioned in Article 3-(1)-4 of the Act shall mean a practice

in which a Business Operator, etc. slanders another Business Operator, etc. or another Business

Operator, etc.’s Product, etc. by labeling or advertising groundless or selectively disadvantageous

facts about them.

(5) Criteria for determining unfair labeling or advertising practices and their categories under

paragraph (1) or (4) may be specified and made public by the Fair Trade Commission. In such cases,

the Fair Trade Commission shall undergo consultation with the heads of relevant central government

agencies prior to making such decisions.

Article 3.2 (Formation and Operation of Critical Information Provision Consultative Committee)

(1) The chairperson of the Critical Information Provision Consultative Committee (hereafter referred

to as “Consultative Committee”) established under Article 4.2 of the Act shall represent the

Consultative Committee and oversee its activities.

(2) The Consultative Committee shall have one secretary who will attend to the Committee’s activities

under the direction of the Chairperson. The secretary shall be appointed from among the staff of the

Fair Trade Commission.

(3) The term of office of the members of the Consultative Committee appointed by the Fair Trade

Commission under Article 4.2-(3)-2 and -3 shall be 2 years, renewable.

(4) A meeting of the Consultative Committee shall be instituted by the presence of a majority of the

Committee members including the chairperson.

(5) Details concerning the formation and operation of the Consultative Committee other than

specified in this Decree shall be determined by the chairperson in consultation with other Committee

members.

[This Article Newly Added 3-29-2006]

Article 4 (Methods of Substantiation, etc.)

(1) When a Business Operator, etc. wants to perform tests or surveys in order to substantiate the facts

included in his/her labels or advertisements pursuant to Article 5-(1) of the Act, he/she shall abide

by the following requirements.

1. A tests or survey used to substantiate facts shall employ objective and verifiable methods which

are academically proven or broadly recognized in an industry.

2. A tests or survey shall be conducted by a testing or survey agency either recognized by law or

managed independently of the Business Operator, etc. commissioning the test or survey; provided

that this provision shall not apply when it is accepted that using such a testing or survey agency is

impractical or inappropriate.

(2) The “testing or research agency …managed independently” in paragraph (1)-2 shall mean any

agency except the following ones. <Amended 3-29-2006>

1. a testing or survey agency managed by the Business Operator, etc. or a subsidiary of his/her

business (a subsidiary as defined by Article 2-(3) of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act)

2. a testing or survey agency which is legally a part of the business group (a business group as

defined by Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act) to

which the Business Operator, etc. belongs but which is technically separated from the business group

under Article 3.2-(1)-2 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act

(3) The Fair Trade Commission may, pursuant to Article 5 of the Act, determine and give public

notice of necessary details concerning requests for submission of substantiating data, examination of

submitted data and determination of subsequent actions to be taken <Newly Added 3-29-2006>

Article 5 (Substantiating Data)

In substantiating data to the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to Article 5-(3) of the Act, a Business

Operator, etc. shall first write a statement containing the following details and attach documents

supporting the details.

1. substantiating method used

2. name of the testing or survey agency, the name, address and telephone number of the agency’s

representative (applicable only when a test or survey has been conducted)

3. substantiating facts or results of a test or survey

4. a list of items, if any, that need to be kept confidential, and reasons for such confidentiality

Article 6 (Disclosure of Substantiating Data)

(1) In disclosing a Business Operator, etc.’s substantiating data for public viewing under Article 5-(4)

of the Act, the Fair Trade Commission may present them in a selective and condensed form in order

to highlight the information most vital to consumer’s purchase choices.

(2) The “business secrets” in the conditional clause of Article 5-(4) of the Act mean the kind of

business secrets defined by Article 2-(2) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret

Protection Act.<Amended 3-29-2006>

Article 7 (Procedures for Recognizing Trade Association’s Regulatory Actions on Labeling and

Advertising)

(1) If a Trade Association wishes to have its regulatory actions against a member Business Operator,

etc.’s labeling or advertising practices recognized by the Fair Trade Union under the conditional

clause of Article 6-(1) of the Act, it shall submit an application to the Fair Trade Commission,

detailing the actions and reasons for them.

(2) Upon receiving an application for recognition under paragraph (1), the Fair Trade Commission

shall notify the applicant of its decision on the matter within 60 days of receiving the application.

Article 8 (Procedures for Giving Public Notice, etc.)

(1) When ordering a Business Operator, etc., pursuant to Article 7-(1)-2 or -3 of the Act, to give public

notice of that fact that he/she has been ordered to take corrective actions or to run an advertisement

correcting misrepresented facts, the Fair Trade Commission shall specify such a public notice or

advertisement in terms of content, frequency, size and medium by taking the following into

consideration. <Amended 3-29-2006>

1. facts and seriousness of violation

2. duration and frequency of violation

(2) When ordering a Business Operator, etc. to give public notice of that fact that he/she has been

ordered to take corrective action or to run an advertisement correcting misrepresented facts, the Fair

Trade Commission may require the Business Operator, etc. to consult with the Commission about the

wording of such a public notice or advertisement. <Amended 3-29-2006>

Article 9 (Agencies and Organizations Entitled to Request Temporary Injunctions)

“Other agencies or organizations specified by a presidential decree” in Article 8-(2) of the Act shall

mean the following.<Amended 3-29-2006, 3-27-2007>

1. the Information and Telecommunications Ethics Commission established under Article 53.2-(1)

of the Telecommunications Business Act

2. the Korea Publication Ethics Commission established under Article 16 of the Publishing and

Printing Promotion Act

3. the Korea Consumer Agency established under Article 33 of the Framework Act on Consumers

4. the Korea Press Ethics Committee and the Korea Advertising Review Board established under

Article 32 of the Civil Act

5. other agencies or organizations established by law to review labeling and advertising by

Business Operators, etc

Article 10 (Procedures for Requesting Temporary Injunctions)

When a consumer organization or one of the agencies or organizations prescribed in Article 9

requests the Fair Trade Commission for a temporary injunction under Article 8-(2) of the Act, it shall

submit a written request stating the following information.

1. the name of the consumer organization, agency or organization making the request, and the

name, address and telephone number of its representative

2. the name of the Business Provider, etc. responsible for the label or advertisement against which

an injunction is sought

3. the content of the label or advertisement

4. reasons for requesting the temporary injunction

Article 11 (Protesting a Temporary Injunction Order)

A Business Operator, etc. who wants to protest a temporary injunction order under Article 8-(3) of the

Act shall submit to the Fair Trade Commission a petition stating the subject matter, protesting details

and reasons for the protest, which shall be attached with necessary supporting documentation.

Article 12 (Calculation of Monetary Penalties)

(1) “Sales revenues as defined by a presidential decree” in Article 9-(1) of the Act shall mean the

Business Operator, etc.’s average sales revenue for the 3 years immediately preceding the current

year; provided that if the Business Operator, etc. has not been in business for 3 years or more, the

sales revenue shall be the amount calculated by converting the total sales revenues recorded from the

starting day of business to the end of the year immediately before the current year into an yearly

figure, and that if the Business Operator, etc. has begun business in the current year, sales revenue

shall be the amount calculated by converting the total sales revenue recorded from the starting day of

business to the day on which the offense was officially recorded into an annual figure.

(2) Other matters relating to monetary penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) such as the criteria and

methods for determining sales revenues as the basis for assessing monetary penalties shall be

determined by the Fair Trade Commission.

Article 13 (Scope of Business Operators, etc. Recording Operating Revenues on Financial Statements)

“Business Operators, etc. specified by a presidential decree” in Article 9-(1) of the Act shall mean

those recording the sum of received payments for Products, etc. as operating revenues on their

financial statements.

Article 14 (Absence of Sales Revenues, etc.)

“Business Operators, etc. or Trade Associations specified by a presidential decree” in the conditional

clause of Article 9-(1) of the Act shall mean any of the following.

1. one who has no recorded operating revenues either because he/she has not begun business or

has suspended business

2. one who has not submitted data for assessing sales revenues or who has submitted false data

3. other cases in which it is considered difficult to assess sales revenues on a objective basis

Article 15 (Criteria for Imposition of Monetary Penalties)

(1) The criteria for assessing monetary penalties under Article 9-(1) and –(2) of the Act shall be as

listed in the table attached hereto.

(2) A monetary penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (1) may be increased or decreased by

considering the information listed in the subparagraphs of Article 9-(3) of the Act.

(3) Detailed criteria for imposing monetary penalties other than those prescribed in this Decree shall

be determined and made public by the Fair Trade Commission.

Article 16 (Levying of Monetary Penalties and Surcharges)

(1) The Fair Trade Commission, in imposing a monetary penalty on a Business Operator, etc. under

Article 9 of the Act, shall provide him/her with a written notification of the category of the violation

committed and the subsequent amount of monetary penalty to be paid.

(2) A Business Operator, etc. shall pay the amount of a monetary penalty imposed on him/her under

paragraph (1) to a collecting agency designated by the Fair Trade Commission within 60 days from

receiving the notification; provided that if an act of God or other unavoidable circumstances have

prevented a Business Operator, etc. from paying a monetary penalty within the prescribed time limit,

he/she shall pay the amount within 30 days after the cause of delay ceased to exist.

Article 16.2 (Reporting of Voluntary Review Organizations, etc.)

(1) If a Business Operator, etc. wants to report a Voluntary Review Organization established under

Article 14.2 of the Act to the Fair Trade Commission, he/she shall file the report in writing or in

electronic form, stating the following details.

1. the name of the reporting person (or, in the case of a corporation, the names of the corporation

and its representative, or in the case of a group, the names of the group and its representative)

2. the address, telephone number and email address of the reporting person

3. the range of investigative activities

4. criteria for investigation

5. legal grounds for the establishment of the Voluntary Review Organization

(2) The organizations specified in subparagraph 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Article 9 shall be considered as having

registered with the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to paragraph (1).

[This Article Newly Added 3-29-2006]

Article 17 Deleted <3.12-2009>

Article 18 Deleted <3.12-2009>

Addendum <No. 21349, 3-12-2009>

This Decree shall come into force on the day of its promulgation.


Législation Remplace (1 texte(s)) Remplace (1 texte(s)) Est remplacé(e) par (1 texte(s)) Est remplacé(e) par (1 texte(s))
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex KR123