À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Ordonnance d'exception sur les marques de fabrique ou de commerce (chapitre 263) (version consolidée en 1998), Hong Kong (Chine)

Retour
Texte abrogé 
Détails Détails Année de version 1998 Dates Émis: 3 septembre 1939 Type de texte Lois en rapport avec la propriété intellectuelle Sujet Marques, Mise en application des droits, Organe de réglementation de la PI Notes This consolidated version of the Trade Marks (Emergency) Ordinance (Chapter 263) incorporates all the amendments up to the Adaptation of Laws (Courts and Tribunals) Ordinance (Ordinance No. 25 of 1998).

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais Trade Marks (Emergency) Ordinance (Chapter 263) (consolidated version of 1998)        
 Trade Marks (Emergency) Ordinance (Cap. 263)

WIPO Database of Intellectual Property Hong KongLegislative Texts

TRADE MARKS (EMERGENCY) ORDINANCE Chapter 263

Long title To make such special provision with respect to trade marks as is expedient to meet any emergency which may arise as a result of war.

[3 September 1939]

(Originally 8 of 1940)

Section 1 Short title

This Ordinance may be cited as the Trade Marks (Emergency) Ordinance.

Section 2 Interpretation

(1) In this Ordinance, unless the context otherwise requires-

“enemy” and “enemy subject” have the meanings respectively assigned to them by the Trading with the Enemy Ordinance 1914*;

“Registrar” means the Registrar within the meaning of the Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap 43).

(2) References in this Ordinance to any enactment shall be construed as references to that enactment as amended by any subsequent enactment, including, except where the context otherwise requires, this Ordinance.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 10(1) U.K.]

Section 3 Power of Registrar to suspend trade mark rights of an enemy or an enemy

subject

(1) where it is made to appear to the Registrar that it is difficult or impracticable to describe or refer to an article, substance or activity without the use of a trade mark registered in respect of that article, substance or activity, being a trade mark which is, or has at any time since the beginning of 3 September 1939 been registered in the name of an enemy or an enemy subject, whether alone or jointly with another, or which is, or has at any such time as aforesaid been, in the proprietorship of an enemy or an enemy subject, whether alone or jointly with another, the following provisions of this section shall have effect. (Amended 44 of 1991 s. 55)

(2) On the application of any person who proposes to deal in the course of trade in Hong Kong with an article or substance which is or is intended to be the same as, or equivalent to or a

* See 25 of 1914 and 12 of 1957.

HK Marks (Emergency War), Ordinance (Cap. 263 Consolidation), 1940 (1998), No. 8 (No. 25) Page 1 / 4

WIPO Database of Intellectual Property Hong KongLegislative Texts

substitute for, the article or substance in respect of which the trade mark is registered, the Registrar may order that the right to the use of the trade mark given by the registration thereof shall be suspended-

(a) � so far as regards use thereof by the applicant and any such use thereof by any other person in relation to goods connected in the course of trade with the applicant as would not be an infringement of the said right if the applicant were the proprietor of the trade mark; (Amended 44 of 1991 s. 55)

(b) � to such extent and for such period as the Registrar may consider necessary for enabling the applicant to render well-known and established some description of, or means of reference to, the article or substance with which he proposes to deal in the course of trade, being a description or means of reference which does not involve the use of the trade mark.

(2A) On the application of any person who proposes to provide in the course of business in Hong Kong services including an activity which is or is intended to be the same as, or equivalent to or a substitute for, the activity in respect of which the trade mark is registered, the Registrar may order that the right to the use of the trade mark given by the registration thereof shall be suspended-

(a) � so far as regards use thereof by the applicant and any such use thereof by any other person in relation to services connected in the course of business with the applicant as would not be an infringement of the said right if the applicant were the proprietor of the trade mark;

(b) � to such extent and for such period as the Registrar may consider necessary for enabling the applicant to render well-known and established some description of, or means of reference to, the activity which he proposes to carry on in the course of business, being a description or means of reference which does not involve the use of the trade mark. (Added 44 of 1991 s. 55)

(3) Where an order has been made under subsection (2) or (2A), no action for passing off shall lie on the part of any person interested in the trade mark in respect of any use thereof which, by virtue of the order, is not an infringement of the right to the use thereof given by the registration thereof. (Amended 44 of 1991 s. 55)

(4) An order under this section may be varied or revoked by a subsequent order made by the Registrar.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 3 U.K.]

Section 4 Effect of war on registration of trade marks

(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5 of the Trading with the Enemy Ordinance 1914*, or any rule of law relating to intercourse or dealings with or for the benefit of enemies, it shall be lawful, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, for a trade mark to be registered under the Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap 43) on the application of an enemy:

Provided that, where such a registration as aforesaid is effected on the application of an enemy-

* See 25 of 1914 and 12 of 1957.

HK Marks (Emergency War), Ordinance (Cap. 263 Consolidation), 1940 (1998), No. 8 (No. 25) Page 2 / 4

WIPO Database of Intellectual Property Hong KongLegislative Texts

(a) � the person registered shall not be entitled to require the issue of the certificate of registration; and

(b) � the rights conferred by the registration shall be subject to any relevant provisions of any enactment for the time being in force relating to the property of an enemy.

(2) The Registrar may, in any case in which in his opinion it is desirable in the public interest so to do, refuse to take, or suspend the taking of, any proceedings on or in relation to an application of an enemy for the registration of a trade mark.

(3) No act requisite for enabling such a registration as aforesaid to be effected, in so far as it is done for that purpose and for that purpose only, shall, whether the registration is effected or not, be treated as a contravention of any of the provisions of section 5 of the Trading with the Enemy Ordinance 1914 (See 25 of 1914 and 12 of 1957), or of any rule of law relating to intercourse or dealings with or for the benefit of enemies.

(4) References in this section to an application of an enemy shall be construed as including references to an application of an enemy jointly with any other person, whether an enemy or not.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 4 U.K.]

Section 5 Power of Registrar to extend time limits having regard to war circumstances

(1) The Registrar may, subject to such conditions, if any, as he thinks fit to impose, extend the time limited by or under the Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap 43), or this Ordinance, for doing any act, where he is satisfied-

(a) � that the doing of the act within the time so limited was prevented by a person’s being on active service or by any other circumstances arising from the existence of a state of war which, in the opinion of the Registrar, justify an extension of the time so limited; or

(b) � that, by reason of circumstances arising from the existence of a state of war, the doing of the act within the time so limited would have been or would be injurious to the rights or interests of the person by or on whose behalf the act is or was to be done or to the public interest.

(2) An extension under this section of the time for doing any act-

(a) � may be for any period that the Registrar thinks fit, notwithstanding that by or under any Ordinance power is conferred to extend the time for doing that act for a specified period only; and

(b) � may be granted notwithstanding that that time expired before any application or request for extension was made, or that, by reason of that act not having been done within that time, the relevant application, registration or proceeding has ceased or expired, or become void or invalid, or been treated as abandoned.

(3) The powers conferred by this section may be exercised notwithstanding that the exercise thereof benefits, whether directly or indirectly, an enemy or an enemy subject.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 6 U.K.]

HK Marks (Emergency War), Ordinance (Cap. 263 Consolidation), 1940 (1998), No. 8 (No. 25) Page 3 / 4

WIPO Database of Intellectual Property Hong KongLegislative Texts

Section 6 Evidence relating to nationality and place of residence, and decisions relating to

enemy character

(1) For the purposes of this Ordinance-

(a) � the fact that the address of any person registered in the register of trade marks kept under the Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap 43) is an address in enemy territory within the meaning of the Trading with the Enemy Ordinance 1914*, shall be prima facie evidence that that person is resident in that territory; and

(b) � the fact that in any such register a person is stated to be of a particular nationality shall be prima facie evidence that he is of that nationality.

(2) No order made by the Registrar under this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid by reason only that any decision made for the purposes of the order that a particular person is an enemy or an enemy subject is wrong.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 7 U.K.]

Section 7 Persons to be heard before making of orders

Before deciding as to the making of any order under this Ordinance, the Registrar shall, unless having regard to the circumstances he considers it inexpedient or impossible so to do, give to any person who appears to the Registrar to be interested such opportunity of being heard as appears to him to be just.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 8 U.K.]

Section 8 Rules and fees

(1) The Chief Justice with the approval of the Legislative council may make rules for regulating the practice under this Ordinance, including rules providing for oppositions and rules regulating the service of documents and the time within which any act authorized or required by this Ordinance or the rules may or must be done.

(2) There shall be paid in respect of applications and other matter under this Ordinance such fees as may be prescribed by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Legislative Council.

[cf. 1939 c. 107 s. 9 U.K.]

* See 25 of 1914 and 12 of 1957.

HK Marks (Emergency War), Ordinance (Cap. 263 Consolidation), 1940 (1998), No. 8 (No. 25) Page 4 / 4


Législation Remplace (1 texte(s)) Remplace (1 texte(s)) est abrogé(e) par (1 texte(s)) est abrogé(e) par (1 texte(s)) Référence du document de l'OMC
IP/N/1/HKG/T/3
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex HK214