ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lego Juris A/S v. Yeon o Jung
Case No. D2022-1295
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Lego Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The LEGO trademark was listed as number 1
Consumer Superbrand by Superbrands UK in 2019, and the Lego Group was named number 1 on the list of
the world’s Top 10 Most Reputable Global Companies of 2020 by the Reputation Institute. ...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Onstad
Case No. D2011-1306
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant is a member of the world famous Lego Group of Companies which has through itself, its predecessors and licensees used the trademark LEGO for over sixty years. ...
2011-10-06 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...
2010-08-11 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Loftuch Cheeck, Whois Agent, Netlify Inc
Case No. D2024-3760
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...According to evidence presented by
the Complainant, they have both resolved to a website displaying an image of a minifigure of Donald Trump
and a model of the White House, both apparently constructed from LEGO toys. The title of the website,
“LEGO TRUMP”, is displayed in the LEGO logotype on a red background. ...
2024-11-08 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. n/a, Domain For Sale
Case No. D2010-0158
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Panel is also satisfied that the Complainant has established that LEGO is a well-known trademark.
The disputed domain name contains the Complainant's mark LEGO in its entirety, with the added suffix “kidsworld”. ...
2010-04-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Amtom Maoeiro
Case No. D2021-2391
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Complainant
The Complainant alleges that it is the owner of the well-known trademark LEGO. In the Complainant’s view, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark. Because the dominant part of the Domain Name is LEGO, the addition of the words “kidstoys” does not mitigate the confusion and will have no impact on the overall impression of the Domain Name. ...
2021-09-28 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. xiaohai Wu, heshengshiyeyouxiangongsi
Case No. D2022-0729
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant
has subsidiaries and branches worldwide and its LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries,
including in China.
The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the
famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products worldwide, including but not
limited to, China Trademark Registration No. 10176185 for LEGO, registered on January 14, 2013.
...
2022-05-06 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark, including but not limited to:
- China Trademark registration No.135134 for LEGO [figurative mark] registered on January 5, 1980;
- United States Trademark registration No. 1018875 for LEGO [typed drawing] registered on August 26,
1975.
...The Complainant further argued that the term “storms” with the Complainant’s LEGO trademark is likely to
heighten confusion, as it is closely similar to the Complainant’s “LEGO Mindstorms” product lines, while the
addition of “potter” closely resembles the Complainant’s “LEGO Harry Potter” line of toys.
...
2023-04-13 - Case Details
如在任何情况下英文裁决和中文译本有任何不一致，应以英文裁决作为作准文本。
4. 基本事实
投诉人，总部设于丹麦，是商标LEGO和其他与LEGO品牌有关的商标的玩具产品和其他LEGO品牌产品的所有人。投诉人和它的授权人，通过他们的前任者，在1953年于美利坚合众国（美国）使用商标LEGO，以识别它们制造及售卖的建筑玩具。
多年来，LEGO品牌玩具的生产和销售业务有显著增长。例如，在2009年，LEGO集团的收入超过28亿美元。投诉人的子公司和分支机构遍布世界各地，LEGO的产品销往超过130个国家和地区，包括中国。投诉人于2007年在北京开设了一家旗舰店。
...
2012-09-28 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of LEGO and other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...The Complainant’s LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. Moreover, the Complainant is the owner of over 5,000 domain names containing the term “lego”, including .
...
2016-08-31 - Case Details
争议域名网站提供有关淘宝网热销减肥产品的排行榜。
5. 当事人双方主张
A. 投诉人
投诉人主张争议域名与投诉人享有权利的LEGO商标混淆性相似，理由如下：
(1) 争议域名的主要部分“lego”与投诉人的注册商标LEGO完全相同；
(2) 争议域名包含的前缀“cd”不影响对争议域名的整体印象，对确定争议域名与LEGO商标的相似性无关。
...6.2 分析与认定
A. 相同或混淆性相似
根据投诉人提交的证据材料，专家组接受投诉人有关其对LEGO商标享有注册商标专用权的主张。
本案争议域名的主体部分由“cd”和“lego”组成；其中，“lego”与投诉人的LEGO商标完全相同，而“cd”似乎并不具有特殊含义。
争议域名完整包含了LEGO商标。...
2012-09-10 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. stan roble
Case No. D2025-0818
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...In 2024 alone the Complainant successfully asserted its LEGO marks against more
than 90 entities who attempted to use and register LEGO-formative domain names.
...
2025-05-05 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainsByProxy.com / None
Case No. D2011-0872
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
...The LEGO trademark was first registered in the United States of America on August 26, 1975. The LEGO corporate group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...
2011-08-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
행정패널 결정문
LEGO Juris A/S v. Nurinet
사건번호: D2012-0126
1. 당사자
신청인: LEGO Juris A/S, 덴마크 빌룬드
신청인의 대리인: Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, 스웨덴
피신청인: Nurinet, 대한민국 경상북도 경주
2. ...따라서 분쟁도메인이름에서 신청인의 유명상표인 LEGO가 주된 구성부분을 차지하고 있고, 이러한 주된 구성부분 뒤에 일반명칭인 “minifigures”를 추가하는 경우, 분쟁도메인이름과 LEGO 상표는 혼동을 야기할 정도로 유사하다고 판단할 수 있다. 더군다나 신청인은 1978년부터 “LEGO Minifigures”라는 이름으로 매우 인기 있는 작은 조각상제품을 생산, 판매해 왔는데, 분쟁도메인이름은 “minifigures”를 신청인의 유명한 상표인 LEGO의 뒷부분에 합쳐져 구성되어 있으므로 분쟁도메인이름과 LEGO 상표는 혼동을 일으킬 정도로 유사하다는 것이 보다 더 확실해진다. ...
2012-03-26 - Case Details
The Complainant and its licensees – the “LEGO Group” – through their predecessors commenced use of the trademark LEGO in the United States of America during 1953. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
As stated in previous UDRP cases, it is indisputable that “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark” (see for instance LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-09-04 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the mark LEGO.
The Panel also finds that the mark LEGO is well-known: see LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260 (“In the present case, the disputed Domain Names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”); and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-11-09 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. deng qingguo
Case No. D2025-1152
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...page 2
4. Factual Background
The Complainant, LEGO Holding A/S (formerly known as LEGO Juris A/S), a limited company incorporated
in Denmark, operates a business in the field of construction toys and related products and is the owner of the
worldwide well-known LEGO brand.
...
2025-05-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Tech Domain Services Private Limited
Case No. D2009-1617
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches all over the world and the LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The LEGO brand is one of the most known trademarks around the world, due in part to decades of extensive advertising.
...
2010-02-08 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Nguyen Tien Luc a.k.a. Tien Luc Nguyen
Case No. D2011-1550
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...D2006-1315.
Adding the word “games” to the trademark LEGO is not in creating any distinction since the word “games” is the name of the product associated with the trademark LEGO. ...
2011-11-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. AbdiPraja
Case No. D2010-2178
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Respondent used the disputed domain name for a website which was headed “Lego Mindstorms Nxt 2.0” and which was devoted to promotion of the Complainant’s Lego Mindstorms NXT 2.0 product. ...
2011-05-02 - Case Details