ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Grady Shah, legoproducts
Case No. D2025-1154
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...DNL2009-0052; LEGO Juris A/S v. Kang Zheng, WIPO Case No. D2010-1924; LEGO Juris A/S v. Kim S J, WIPO Case No. D2014-
0884; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2025-05-16 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Cédric Fiducia Bavoux
Case No. D2022-4702
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant also owns close to 5,000 domain names which contain the term “lego” and notably
maintains an extensive website under the domain name .
The LEGO trademark has been ranked number 1 in the official Top 10 Consumer Superbrands for 2019 and
number 8 in the Consumer Relevancy Index. ...
2023-01-27 - Case Details
Complainant has subsidiaries and branches
throughout the world and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries.
Complainant has exclusive rights in LEGO, and LEGO related marks (hereinaf ter “LEGO marks”).
...Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark
LEGO. The dominant part of the disputed domain names comprises the mark LEGO, identical to the
trademarks LEGO. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com Domain Privacy / Siripong Soonklang
Case No. D2013-1795
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant believes that due to the wide recognition of the LEGO trademark, the Respondent must have known the Complainant and its LEGO trademark when registering the disputed domain name. ...
2013-12-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
According to the Complaint, Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Denmark. Complainant is the owner of LEGO trademarks used in connection with the Lego construction toys and other Lego branded products. Lego products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in Pakistan. ...Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-05-10 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Tanawat Tongwan
Case No. D2016-1594
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...It creates a clear likelihood of confusion and association with the Complainant’s well-known trademark LEGO and its product line “Lego Minifigures” (a theme based on a set of collectible LEGO mini figures introduced in 2010), which is not avoided by any additional element or the inclusion of any disclaimer in the Respondent’s website.
...
2016-09-19 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO. The Domain Name in question is clearly confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark LEGO. ...
2012-06-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Wang Keke
Case No. D2014-2003
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...
2015-01-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Aswadi Aziz
Case No. D2013-1085
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant and its licensees – the LEGO Group – through their predecessors commenced use of the trademark LEGO in the United States of America during 1953. ...
2013-09-02 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the holder of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (Annex 6 of the Complaint). ...In the letter the Complainant advised the registrant that the unauthorized use of the LEGO trademark in the Domain Name violated the rights in the trademark LEGO, owned by the Complainant. ...
2012-06-11 - Case Details
投诉人还拥有2400多个包含“lego”字样的域名。2009年“LEGO”被Superbrands UK评为世界最著名品牌第八名。LEGO商标的高知名程度已经得到先前多个UDRP案件专家组的肯定，在LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Rampe Purda, WIPO案件编号D2010-0840，LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Domain Administrator, WIPO案件编号D2010-1260，和LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO案件编号D2009-0680中，专家组分别认定LEGO是驰名商标或享有高度声誉的品牌。
...据此，专家组认定政策第4(a)条所规定的第二个条件已经得以证明。
C. 恶意注册和使用域名
投诉人主张，投诉人的LEGO商标具有很高的知名度。2009年“LEGO”被Superbrands UK评为世界最著名品牌第八名。LEGO商标的高知名程度已经得到先前多个UDRP案件专家组的肯定，在案件LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Rampe Purda, 同上，LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Domain Administrator, 同上，和LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Reginald Hastings Jr, 同上中，专家组分别认定LEGO是驰名商标或享有高度声誉的品牌。...
2012-07-31 - Case Details
In August 2009 LEGO released a newer version called the LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT 2.0.
The Complainant is also the owner of more than 1000 domain names containing the term LEGO.
The trademark LEGO is among the best-known trademarks in the world.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...
2010-06-17 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Xiaolong Hao
Case No. D2025-5381
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...As per
the incorporation documents filed with the Complaint, in January 2025, the Complainant changed its name
from LEGO Juris A/S to the current LEGO Holding A/S in order to bring together all LEGO branded and
related activities under one governance structure.
...
2026-02-12 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. liang man qing
Case No. D2019-2232
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The website promotes educational products for children, including乐高 (i.e. LEGO) construction sets, 乐高 (i.e. LEGO) WeDo 2.0 software (used with LEGO Education products) as well as Scratch children’s software produced by a third party.
...
2019-11-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lego Juris A/S v. Thomas Dickinson
Case No. D2011-1706
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Lego Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant also owns more than 1,000 domain names incorporating the term “lego”.
The Complainant’s mark LEGO has become well known, and a number of UDRP panels have concluded that LEGO is a famous mark. ...
2011-12-14 - Case Details
The Complainant owns trade mark registrations around the world for the mark LEGO in relation to various goods and services. The LEGO trade mark was registered in Thailand in 1979.
...Several other UDRP panels have made similar findings: see LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-03-04 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. maria silva
Case No. D2025-3593
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Generate traffic and income by offering for sale LEGO Icons McLaren Ayron Senna models, while also
featuring the Complainant’s trade mark LEGO, its logo and its product.
2. ...
2025-10-29 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. joo byung jin
Case No. D2023-0712
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The
Complainant is the owner of LEGO trademarks in a number of jurisdictions around the world, and the
following in the Republic of Korea: LEGO registered in Korean Class 28 on February 10, 2010 (Korean
Trademark Registration Number 4000666770000) and LEGO registered in Nice Classes 16 and 27 on June
10, 2005 (Korean Trademark Registration Number 4001123270000). ...
2023-04-25 - Case Details
The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant LEGO Juris A/S is based in Denmark. The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO, LEGOLAND, and other trademarks used in connection with construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The LEGO group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer-controlled robotic construction sets.
...
2021-09-27 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Karol Kruszyniewicz, VEG KING EUROPE LTD
Case No. D2024-3065
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Domain Name was registered on February 23, 2024, decades after Complainant began using the LEGO
mark in commerce.
According to Complainant:
“Respondent has intentionally chosen a domain name based on a registered trademark in order to generate
traffic and income through an unauthorised website offering products inspired by the Complainant’s own
LEGO® products. […] In particular, the Respondent is using the Domain Name to host a website that offers
for sale “Lego wall panels”, which is not an official LEGO product but is designed to look like Complainant’s
famous LEGO bricks while appealing to customers of the Complainant’s LEGO® brand.”
...
2024-09-24 - Case Details