The Complainant includes printouts of captures from the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> showing the website:
(a) in 2014 and 2015 featured a banner or logo “MYBOOKIE.AG” in block capitals where the “my” is red and the other letters are white against a black background;
(b) in 2016, 2017, and 2018, there is no banner or logo but the name “MyBookie” appears numerous times in bold text to differentiate from other text;
(c) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, there is a banner or logo “MYBOOKIE” in block capitals in which the letters “my” are in orange and the remaining letters are in white, against a black background.
...
2021-11-23 - Case Details
The Respondent was named Orizon Multimedia Inc. and the evidence from archive.org (see above) clearly shows the registration was in connection with a bona fide business and was used by the Respondent to link to its own legitimate website. ...
2020-09-18 - Case Details
The Complaint includes screenshots of the website obtained from the Wayback Machine at
“https://archive.org” dating from as early as November 11, 2008. These screenshots show prominent use of
the name “Github” as a trade mark as well as use of the domain name.
...
2023-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent also states that historical screenshots of the website available at the disputed domain name taken from Archive.org and DomainTools.com from 2011 to present (submitted as annex to the Response) document the Respondent’s bona fide use of the disputed domain name in rotating pay-per-click and lead generation sites.
...
2016-12-29 - Case Details
The evidence is a screenshot of a webpage pertaining to the disputed domain name in the year 2015, from “www,archive.org”. On that page, the Respondent has used a different name “Santa Fe Packers and Movers” and the webpage clearly shows the disputed domain name has been put up for sale.
...
2017-06-23 - Case Details
Screen captures from searches carried out on Archive.org show that in February 2011, the disputed domain name temporarily resolved to a GoDaddy parking page displaying pay-per-click links. ...
2019-02-18 - Case Details
Amongst other things, the business operates online through and . The Wayback Machine at <archive.org> shows that an active website for the Miss Mafia LLC business was first crawled on July 9, 2016. ...
2019-08-12 - Case Details
When the Complaint was filed, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name did not resolve to an active website and had not done so since at least 2004. A search of the “wayback machine” at archive.org substantially confirms this claim. At the time this decision was prepared, however, the disputed domain name did resolve to a website that appears to offer a range of IT services, but not on their face the web hosting or ISP services for which the Complainant has secured a trademark registration.
...
2010-12-09 - Case Details
The search box is the generic default that is set for all domain names newly arriving in Xedoc’s account at Fabulous.com.”
5.20 The Respondent also contends that it is not odd that robot.txt has been used in such a way that it prevents the retrieval of historical records for the Domain Name from the archive.org web sites. The explanation given for this is that:
“advertisers regularly require that a publisher exclude “clicks” generated by automated systems. The spiders and crawlers used by Archive.org to generate images are in fact automated systems and their entry to the website would trigger prohibited “clicks”. ...
2008-07-24 - Case Details
Regardless of that inconsistency, the disputed domain names were still operated as a free webmail service and regardless of the [http] html content shown on the URL, the email services remained and remain unchanged.
According to Customer Service for Archive.org, the reliability of their indexing service is not to be taken “as 100%”. There are numerous examples of domain names and websites not being indexed regularly or at all. The Respondent cites which was registered by the Respondent in December 1998. However, according to Archive.org, no domain name was published until February 2002. In the Respondent’s view, that “fact” is nonsense, since the Respondent used more than 500 domain names with the You’ve Got Post! ...
2005-06-01 - Case Details
Again, contrary to the Complainant's assertion the Disputed Domain Name has not been the subject of passive holding. Archive.org shows that at least since July 17, 2008 the Disputed Domain Name has directed to a site displaying the Respondent's name, trade mark and telephone number in the manner described in paragraph 5 above. ...
2014-06-02 - Case Details
The historical captures of the Respondent’s website on The Wayback Machine at <archive.org> (which the Respondent invited the Panel to examine, and which the Panel is within bounds to do (see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.8)) are consistent with the Respondent’s assertions that it is a reseller of authentic items.
...
2021-11-12 - Case Details
An archived copy of the website from March 11, 2007 from <archive.org> also shows similar content.
Complainant further states that after becoming aware of the registration of the disputed domain name in December 2009, it advised Respondent by email dated January 18, 2010 that Respondent's unauthorized use of the ROLLS-ROYCE trademark in connection with the disputed domain name violated Complainant's trademark rights. ...
2010-05-14 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel has carried out limited factual research (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on
Selected UDRP Questions,
Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”) section 4.8) with the following results:
1) it appears that the Complainant may have discontinued use of the AHNU brand in 2018 - see
https://footwearnews.com/business/business-news/deckers-launches-ahnu-sneaker-brand-release-info-
1203598526.
2) searches on archive.org would appear to indicate that in 2020 and up to April 16, 2021 (the date of the last
available snapshot prior to the Respondent’s registration of the domain name at issue), the domain name
continued to be used, but by means of redirecting to a website promoting footwear brands of
the Complainant other than the AHNU brand.
...
2024-06-25 - Case Details
This proposition is based on the fact that the Respondent made no use of the Domain Name for a period of almost four years, up to some date after May 21, 2013 (the last snapshot of the Respondent’s web page under the Domain Name from the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>) produced by the Complainant that shows the Domain Name as “parked”. From this, and from the fact that the Respondent has registered many domain names that comprise the well-known brand names of other companies, the Complainant concludes that the Respondent’s website is just a ruse, created in light of the Complainant’s obvious interest in the Domain Name, in order to push up the price he could demand. ...
2015-04-10 - Case Details
The Complainant says that the Respondent does not own any registered trademark for “diler”, and that the Complainant has never provided the Respondent with any permission or license regarding the use of its trademarks. By reference to evidence from “archive.org” of the Respondent’s website, the Complainant says that there has never been any active use of the Respondent’s website: that it has not published any kind of service and that the page has remained blank.
...
2014-03-11 - Case Details
According to auDA, the disputed domain name was first registered in the Respondent’s name on September
27, 2020.
According to Wayback Machine records at <archive.org>, during 2018 the disputed domain name resolved
to a website at which baby and mothercare products were offered for sale under the name “Metro Baby”.
...
2022-07-28 - Case Details
This is evident not only from the existing active website at the disputed domain name but also on archive.org showing use since December 1998. The website clearly shows that the Respondent has been a supplier of high quality customized leather products and the word “PUMA” or “PUMA Exports” is nowhere used upon any products supplied.
...
2021-08-10 - Case Details
On April 14, 2017, the Respondent registered the domain name .
A 2019 Archive.org screenshot shows use of the domain name by the Complainant for a website branded “Kinetik Adrenalink” offering branded clothing for sale that included the word “Kinetik” and the K Arrow Logo.
...
2021-06-01 - Case Details
d) La marca tiene una importante presencia en las tiendas físicas en Internet, incluyendo redes sociales y ha
sido utilizada ininterrumpidamente:
d.1 Por lo menos desde el mes de diciembre del 2002, tal y como se puede evidenciar del sitio de Internet
WAYBACK MACHINE visible en Wayback Machine (archive.org), en el que se registran por lo menos 205
visitas al sitio (disponibles para verificación) desde esa fecha.
...
2024-11-28 - Case Details