Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns two trademark registrations for the mark JAFRA in the United States. The trademark is a...descriptive terms do not alter the fact that the domain name is confusingly similar to the mark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The Respondent has no rights...
2006-08-15 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to the SHAW� Registrations and the SHAW Marks. The domain name contains the identical SHAW Registrations and the SHAW Marks...conclusion that Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to registrations in which the Complainants have rights. (iv) The domain name is confusingly...
2007-05-03 - Case Details
is that the domain names are confusingly similar to its mark and is a classic case of typo-piracy. The Respondent Keyword Marketing, Inc. (a/k/a...Marketing Total S.A and Domain Drop S.A) has registered the domain names which are confusingly similar to its famous mark and its business name. The...
2007-12-10 - Case Details
of the Complainant. The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...Complainant to own or use any domain names which are confusingly similar to those of Piaget. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2014-07-30 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has registered the PFIZER name as a trademark in the United States and holds several U.S. trademark registrations for PFIZER...is confusingly similar to Pfizer’s own domain name ; and (v) is so clearly similar to the Complainant’s PFIZER mark that it is likely to cause...
2004-09-07 - Case Details
’ registered trademarks DR. MARTENS and DOC MARTENS. Therefore, the disputed domain names should be considered confusingly similar to Complainants’ senior marks...are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...
2011-05-18 - Case Details
three circumstances in order to obtain the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark. The Panel finds that the Complainants have proven that they have registered rights in the...
2010-08-13 - Case Details
names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade marks as they incorporate either the BMW trade mark in its entirety or a contraction to “BM”, i.e...disputed domain names confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark also constitutes a bad faith pattern. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to...
2020-03-06 - Case Details
and services. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant says that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its PIXABAY trademark...misspelling of a trademark is considered by panels to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for purposes of the first element.” The Complainant says that...
2022-08-22 - Case Details
Complainants assert that: (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ registered SPRINGER trademark; (2) the Respondent lacks rights...of registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar or identical to a famous trademark by an entity that has no relationship to that mark is...
2023-04-18 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s JUNGLE BOYS Mark. - the Respondent has no rights...three elements in order to prevail in this proceeding: (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to trademarks or service marks in...
2023-10-04 - Case Details
contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which it has rights. The disputed domain name uses the HIKE mark...and is being used in bad faith. Apart from making false and misleading claims on the website, the use of a confusingly similar domain name that is...
2016-05-03 - Case Details
- the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s PLAYBOY Mark; - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...Complainant, the Complainant must prove the following (Policy, paragraph 4(a)): (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or confusingly similar Complainant asserts that its F5 registered trademarks protect its rights in the...marks F5, F5 (and design) and F5 NETWORKS, as well as extending to protect against the confusingly similar marks, such as F5 PROTECT or F5-PROTECT...
2020-10-28 - Case Details
Complainant”. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires a two-fold inquiry, a threshold investigation...into whether a complainant has rights in a trademark, followed by an assessment of whether the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that...
2022-02-07 - Case Details
2006. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name reproduces entirely the previously registered...confusingly similar to the trademark. Numerous WIPO decisions recognize that adding a single letter is insufficient to give any distinctiveness to the disputed...
2006-11-20 - Case Details
Respondent had, on October 22, 2010, registered the disputed domain name which is virtually identical/confusingly similar to the Complainants’ trade mark...prove each of the following: (i) That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...
2011-04-19 - Case Details
the user types in the domain name, he or she is redirected to the domain name . 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar...registered mark and are therefore confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered mark MFS. The Complainant relies on UDRP Decisions which recognize that a...
2011-04-19 - Case Details
Complaint. The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s OMEGA and OMEGA + Ω trademarks. The Complainant...Omega SA v. Domain Admin , NAF Claim No. FA1302921 (Feb. 24, 2010) (finding confusingly similar to Complainant’s OMEGA marks); Fossil, Inc. v. Galina...
2011-03-14 - Case Details
footed pajamas. The Domain Name was registered on October 15, 2008. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Domain Name..., is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered JUMPIN JAMMERZ trademark, the only difference being that the Respondent has added a “g” to the word...
2011-07-21 - Case Details