confusingly similar to a trademark or service in which the Complainant has rights; (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to...
2001-09-28 - Case Details
transfer, a Complainant must prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to...
2001-12-10 - Case Details
4(a) of the Policy. These elements are as follows: (i) Respondent’s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2004-07-13 - Case Details
Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant contends that she owns rights in the mark XI. Since that mark is...
2004-06-22 - Case Details
the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2. That Respondent has no...
2000-04-10 - Case Details
Findings The key issue in this proceeding is not whether the Domain Name is identical and/or confusingly similar to the Complaint�s trade mark or whether the...
2000-05-05 - Case Details
each of the following: (a) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service in which the...
2006-08-24 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark registrations...
2006-06-21 - Case Details
proceeding through mere default of the Respondent, the Panel makes the following specific findings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The similarity between...
2005-08-17 - Case Details
reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain names and are identical to the...
2005-06-16 - Case Details
rights in a trade or service mark with which the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar (paragraph 4(a)(i)) On the face of the...
2005-05-26 - Case Details
principle on the part of the Respondent to transfer the disputed name to the Complainant. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It...
2006-03-02 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its Marks. Complainant alleges that Respondent lacks...
2006-01-04 - Case Details
been established in the present case, namely that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade or service mark in which the...
2010-07-16 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar Even though more relevant under the second and third element of the UDRP, the Panel notes that the registration of the...
2008-04-01 - Case Details
Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name fully...
2008-02-15 - Case Details
Respondent indicated that it would not be willing to sell the Domain Name for less than $5,000. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant asserts that the...respondent’s domain name: (i) that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; (ii...
2008-02-07 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to his professional name “John Bowers QC”. The Complainant alleges that...
2009-01-14 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. The determination of whether a Complainant has rights in a mark sufficient to invoke the Policy under paragraph...
2007-12-07 - Case Details
primarily to male enhancement-related products. See Reply, Exhibit A. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that...
2007-11-02 - Case Details