Complainant
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s NINEBOT mark. The Complainant explains that the NINEBOT mark actually is a combination of the words “nine” and “robot”, and adds that the country-code top-level domain (“ccTLD”) <.cc> does not preclude a finding of confusing similarity.
...International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000‑0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the NINEBOT mark, in which the Complainant has established rights through registration and use. ...
2021-11-16 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s GEICO mark.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence presented, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the GEICO mark.
...
2021-10-12 - Case Details
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules directs the Panel to decide the Complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain names are identical with, or confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s trademark rights.
There are two parts to this inquiry: the Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a trademark at the date the Complaint was filed and, if so, the disputed domain names must be shown to be identical or confusingly similar to the trademark.
The Complainant has proven ownership of the registered trademarks COVETRUS identified in section 4 above.
...
2021-10-01 - Case Details
The Panel will therefore deal with each of these requirements.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
To prove this element, the Complainant must first establish that there is a trademark or service mark in which it has rights. ...Previous UDRP panels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a widely known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.
...
2021-08-05 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
I. Identical or Confusingly Similar
That the Complaint is based on the prior rights that the Complainant has over the ENEL trademark in Italy and many other countries.
That numerous panels appointed under the Policy have found that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a company’s name and trademark when, as in this case, the domain name incorporates said name and trademark completely.
...
2021-11-10 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
registered trademark. The first element of the Policy is satisfied.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Under paragraph 4(c) of the Policy, a respondent may demonstrate rights or legitimate interests by showing bona fide use, being commonly known by the domain name, or legitimate noncommercial or fair use. ...
2025-09-22 - Case Details
The Panel has reviewed the case and found the following:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...The Panel finds the
Complainants’ mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
The Panel has disregarded the gTLD in this case “.com”. ...
2025-09-09 - Case Details
The Panel therefore confirms that NMBS is not a party to these proceedings and will proceed
solely against George May of NM&A as the Respondent.
6.2 Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within all the Domain Names. Accordingly, the
Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview
3.0, section 1.7.
...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel decides to consolidate the disputes regarding the nominally different disputed domain
name registrants (referred to below as “the Respondent”) in a single proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondents
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-10-14 - Case Details
Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-09-03 - Case Details
Notably, the Complainant contends that:
- The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s JCDECAUX trade mark. The
disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s trade mark with the addition of the suffix “-uzb”.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.2 Substantive issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions and is therefore in default.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-09-01 - Case Details
The Panel will therefore proceed to analyze whether the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy
are satisfied.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered or Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2026-02-13 - Case Details
The Panel will therefore proceed to analyze whether the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy are
satisfied.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2026-02-11 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element of the Policy requires the Complainant to establish that the Disputed Domain Name is
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...case=D2012-1909
page 4
element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have relevant trademark rights; and second, is
the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to those rights.
The Complainant has rights in NEXT-MICROBIOME trademark. This registration constitutes prima facie
evidence of the Complainant's rights in the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-09 - Case Details
Respondent
5.4 The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
6.1 It is generally accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-10-23 - Case Details
In the interest of fairness and due process, the Panel decides to accept the Late Response.
6.2. Substantive issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-12-01 - Case Details
Had the response been filed in either Russian or English, the Panel would have been able to consider it.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-12-01 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
6.2 Findings on the Merits
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Discussion and Findings
6.1 Preliminary Issue: Language of the Proceeding
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-12-16 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel decides to consolidate the disputes regarding the nominally different disputed domain
name registrants (referred to below as “the Respondent”) in a single proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
On the contrary, as the Complainant claimed, the disputed domain names resolved to “under construction” pages and a fake login page related to the management of the Carrefour Pass credit card. ...
2025-12-16 - Case Details