Policy, in order to succeed in this proceeding, the Complainant must prove (i) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which...
2010-05-10 - Case Details
desist letter from the Complainant at any time. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is found to be...
2010-03-19 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has no rights or...confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2010-03-15 - Case Details
period of ten years.” 2 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain names are, for all intents...
2010-02-22 - Case Details
Lawrence Colbert, WIPO Case No. D2008-1836 “ The domain name incorporates a non-distinctive word and is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade marks...
2010-02-18 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2010-01-25 - Case Details
present proceeding. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the mark GERMANWINGS, of which the Complainant is a...
2009-10-27 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established its rights in the trademark YEM KITABEVI with logo, in Turkey, by enclosing the trademark certificate issued...
2007-02-26 - Case Details
respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no...
2007-06-29 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name is identical to the trademark KUONI in which the Complainant has rights (the gTLD...
2007-04-27 - Case Details
and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain names are and and the Complainant's trademark is ERIS UN. The disputed domain names...
2008-08-27 - Case Details
Respondent The Respondent did not formally reply to the Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2008-08-19 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names...identical to the Complainant’s mark, disregarding the domain suffix and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar thereto, differing only by...
2020-01-02 - Case Details
in all respects under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainants must prove that: (i) the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar...similar to that operating from the Domain Name. Differences included the following: (i) At the top of the page was a banner that read “Rapidshare...
2010-08-18 - Case Details
Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The only relevant consideration for the purposes of the first limb of the Policy is whether...the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to a trade mark in respect of which the Complainant has rights. The date of registration or...
2015-10-06 - Case Details
(i) The domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights...being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has rights in the Trademark. A comparison between...
2016-11-01 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...they assist in resolving disputed issues of fact. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant does not own any registered trademarks for...
2014-11-05 - Case Details
confusingly similar; addition of common or descriptive words to a well-known mark does not obviate confusion. 2. The Complainant has not authorized the...4.16 . 1 B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Respondents raise a preliminary issue about this Complainant’s right to invoke the Policy when its...
2014-10-29 - Case Details
the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has established trademark rights in the term ENPOWER and that the disputed domain name is identical...
2011-12-19 - Case Details
disputed domain name; and (iii) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...the following to justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly...
2012-09-26 - Case Details