relief. These elements are that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights...in bad faith. Each of the aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant...
2013-12-30 - Case Details
The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Domain Name is identical to the mark ADAC in which the Complainant has registered rights. For the purpose of this requirement, it is...
2013-06-19 - Case Details
representing the respondent in the prior UDRP proceeding. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered trademark...concerns a new Respondent and that these proceedings do not constitute a refiled case. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has evidenced to the...
2017-02-13 - Case Details
Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no rights...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the BANKWEST Trademarks. The Complainant manifestly has registered...
2017-07-14 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has...or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence and has thus established its rights in the PETPLAN trademark, as described in section 4...
2018-07-04 - Case Details
lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that Complainant has...
2018-06-18 - Case Details
justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence and has thus...
2019-02-05 - Case Details
justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As is apparent from the evidence submitted by...
2018-03-06 - Case Details
decision that a domain name should be either cancelled or transferred: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...Case No. D2000-0270 . B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel initially addresses whether the Complainant has established trademark rights in MARK...
2018-01-19 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Trademark. In fact, the Disputed Domain Name fully includes its verbal element, and the trademark is recognizable in the Disputed...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2021-03-10 - Case Details
transfer of the disputed domain names: (i) each of the disputed domain names is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...registered and is using the disputed domain names in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it has unregistered trademark...
2020-11-17 - Case Details
must prove each of the following elements: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Based on the evidence provided, the Panel finds that the...
2021-01-28 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the domain name; and 3) that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2002-05-29 - Case Details
Response. Substantive Issues The Complainant must establish that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...that penguin.org > is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights but we are not satisfied that...
2000-05-24 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. When the Complaint was filed, the Complainant did not have a...confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trade mark. In conclusion, the Panel finds that paragraph 4(a)(i) has been proved. That the Respondent has no rights or...
2000-08-16 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests...in respect of the domain name; and the domain has been registered and is being used in bad faith. 6.2 Identical or Confusingly Similar Notwithstanding...
2000-11-23 - Case Details
and confusingly similar to the complainant�s company name. The complainant believes that in view of the stated fact that the domain is for sale, it is...a complainant must prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2000-11-02 - Case Details
cases identical to, and in every instance confusingly similar to, the Adelphia Marks," citing Twentieth Century Fox v. David Risser, FA 0002 000093761...prove, with respect to each domain name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to an Adelphia trademark...
2001-01-25 - Case Details
must prove each of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark..."legeforeningen.com" is transferred to Complainant. B. Respondent In his response, the Respondent has stated the following: 1. The domain name is not "confusingly...
2000-11-22 - Case Details
that a complainant must prove each of the following elements: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...the three elements apply cumulatively, a failure to satisfy any one element will result in the Complaint being denied. A. Identical or Confusingly...
2021-05-25 - Case Details