is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar For...
2021-10-04 - Case Details
UDRP, the Panel will refer to prior UDRP cases and doctrine where appropriate. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has rights in the GILEAD...relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of...
2021-10-28 - Case Details
use and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant seeks to establish unregistered or common law rights in the trademark MCGRAW based on its use in connection with...
2022-03-14 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant indisputably has rights in the LENDSCAPE mark, both by virtue of its trademark registrations and as a result of its...Preliminary issue: Complainant’s Unsolicited Supplemental Filing and Panel Procedural Order No. 1 B. Identical or Confusingly Similar C. Rights or Legitimate...
2022-12-13 - Case Details
Names are identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...Identical or Confusingly Similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights The difficulty the Complaint faces is that it does not have any relevant...
2022-08-12 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) are present: (i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...allowed to use Domain Names which are identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks owned by the Complainant. The Complainant disputes this. While the...
2002-05-27 - Case Details
that the Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...the disputed domain name; and (iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. B. Identical or Confusingly...
2011-08-12 - Case Details
in the case at hand, the Panel opts not to consider the Supplemental filing of the Complainant. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...the domain name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar”; Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. v. Peter Ojo , WIPO Case No...
2010-11-09 - Case Details
domain name; and (iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. (a) Identical or confusingly similar The only difference between...Policy, the Complainant must prove that each of the following three elements are present: (i) the Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly...
2001-05-30 - Case Details
domain name 4TEL.COM is confusingly similar to Complainant's registered trademark 4-TEL. Complainant asserts that Respondent "should be considered as...of the Policy directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following: 1. That the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...
2000-05-10 - Case Details
STEINLAGER word mark and confusingly similar to the STEINLAGER label mark. Lion relies inter alia on the following matters as evidence that Mr. Waugh has no...following:- (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to one of Lion�s trade marks or service marks, and Mr. Waugh has no rights or...
2000-04-05 - Case Details
Complaint asserts that the domain names in dispute are, on their face, identical to the Marks or in any event confusingly similar to the Marks. 5.3 The...paragraph 4(a). 6.2 Domain Names identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s Marks The domain names in dispute are thewiggles.com and...
2000-04-21 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...they are neither controlling nor binding on this Administrative Panel. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is common-ground that the subject domain...
2006-08-16 - Case Details
Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; the Respondent has no rights or...relation to trademark rights in THE KNOT. The Panel found the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark THE KNOT and the...
2008-03-26 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy to establish: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith by the Respondent. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the...
2008-02-13 - Case Details
following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii...documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any Rules and principles of law that it deems applicable”. B. Identical or Confusingly...
2011-04-07 - Case Details
to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainants must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...The Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar There is no dispute that the...
2006-10-13 - Case Details
response was received. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the Complainant asserts that, as a consequence of...the Complainant’s undisputed representations. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the...
2007-04-27 - Case Details
of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...and used in bad faith. Identity or confusingly similarity to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights The domain name "domina.net...
2000-08-01 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that the domain name is, for allintents and purposes, identical to the EUROCHANNEL mark. The addition of...thetop level domain designation “.com” is of no legal significancein determining whether a mark and domain name are identical or confusingly similar.See...
2005-06-10 - Case Details