About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.211 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50961 - 50980  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0132 for starluckbingo.com html (16 KB)

designation, making it identical and/or confusingly similar to Complainant�s "Starluck" mark and the "Starluck family" of domain names and common law trademarks...

2003-05-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0894 for rapidsharefilesdownload.com, rapidsharemegaupload.com, rapidsharewarezmegaupload.com html (83 KB)

in all respects under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainants must prove that: (i) the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar...similar to that operating from the Domain Name. Differences included the following: (i) At the top of the page was a banner that read “Rapidshare...

2010-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2542 for airlinen.com, airlinens.com html (76 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names...identical to the Complainant’s mark, disregarding the domain suffix and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar thereto, differing only by...

2020-01-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DRO2001-0001 for philips.ro html (39 KB)

domain name; and (iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. (a) Identical or confusingly similar The only difference between...Policy, the Complainant must prove that each of the following three elements are present: (i) the Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly...

2001-05-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0026 for 4tel.com html (32 KB)

domain name 4TEL.COM is confusingly similar to Complainant's registered trademark 4-TEL. Complainant asserts that Respondent "should be considered as...of the Policy directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following: 1. That the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...

2000-05-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0030 for steinlager.com html (27 KB)

STEINLAGER word mark and confusingly similar to the STEINLAGER label mark. Lion relies inter alia on the following matters as evidence that Mr. Waugh has no...following:- (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to one of Lion�s trade marks or service marks, and Mr. Waugh has no rights or...

2000-04-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0204 for penguin.org html (31 KB)

Response. Substantive Issues The Complainant must establish that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...that penguin.org > is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights but we are not satisfied that...

2000-05-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0730 for gallerina.com html (25 KB)

or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. When the Complaint was filed, the Complainant did not have a...confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trade mark. In conclusion, the Panel finds that paragraph 4(a)(i) has been proved. That the Respondent has no rights or...

2000-08-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0853 for saradar.com html (29 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests...in respect of the domain name; and the domain has been registered and is being used in bad faith. 6.2 Identical or Confusingly Similar Notwithstanding...

2000-11-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1163 for worldphone.com html (27 KB)

and confusingly similar to the complainant�s company name. The complainant believes that in view of the stated fact that the domain is for sale, it is...a complainant must prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2000-11-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1170 for adelphiacable.com, adelphiacable.net, adelphiaonline.com, adelphiaonline.net html (28 KB)

cases identical to, and in every instance confusingly similar to, the Adelphia Marks," citing Twentieth Century Fox v. David Risser, FA 0002 000093761...prove, with respect to each domain name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to an Adelphia trademark...

2001-01-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1267 for legeforeningen.com html (30 KB)

must prove each of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark..."legeforeningen.com" is transferred to Complainant. B. Respondent In his response, the Respondent has stated the following: 1. The domain name is not "confusingly...

2000-11-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0124 for henrytheoctopus.com, thewiggles.com html (27 KB)

Complaint asserts that the domain names in dispute are, on their face, identical to the Marks or in any event confusingly similar to the Marks. 5.3 The...paragraph 4(a). 6.2 Domain Names identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s Marks The domain names in dispute are thewiggles.com and...

2000-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1326 for altom.com html (33 KB)

disputed domain name; and (iii) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...the following to justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly...

2012-09-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1694 for realtymark.com html (31 KB)

relief. These elements are that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights...in bad faith. Each of the aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant...

2013-12-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1384 for cyclingtips.com html (34 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...they assist in resolving disputed issues of fact. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant does not own any registered trademarks for...

2014-11-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1433 for boschappliancepro.info, boschappliancerepairs.info, boschapplianceservice.info, boschapplianceserviceflorida.info, boschpro.info, boschservicepro.info, boschtech.info, gaggenauappliancerepairflorida.info, gaggenauappliancerepairs.info, gaggenaupro.info, gaggenauservice.info ... html (37 KB)

confusingly similar; addition of common or descriptive words to a well-known mark does not obviate confusion. 2. The Complainant has not authorized the...4.16 . 1 B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Respondents raise a preliminary issue about this Complainant’s right to invoke the Policy when its...

2014-10-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0411 for adac.net html (28 KB)

The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Domain Name is identical to the mark ADAC in which the Complainant has registered rights. For the purpose of this requirement, it is...

2013-06-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-0807 for bankwest.com html (31 KB)

Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no rights...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the BANKWEST Trademarks. The Complainant manifestly has registered...

2017-07-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0774 for gassan.com html (31 KB)

that the Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...the disputed domain name; and (iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. B. Identical or Confusingly...

2011-08-12 - Case Details