https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
Complainant and its BLOCKFI Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-06-08 - Case Details
The Respondent’s
registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use had been done for
the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its OUTFRONT Mark.
See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847
(“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon
the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and initial use of
the Disputed Domain Name to impersonate the Complainant and create a website providing similar goods
and services as those of the Complainant, and using the Complainant’s stylized FXDD Mark indicate that
such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its FXDD Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-10-05 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
For these reasons, this Panel finds that Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name was in bad faith.
7. ...
2021-08-13 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use has been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its PLAYBOY Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”). ...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
case=D2015-1149
página 5
Asimismo, la Demandante ha acreditado que el código fuente de la página web del Demandado contenía
específicamente la marca CORPBANCA (incluyendo la letra P) de la Demandante, lo que confirma el
propósito fraudulento y parasitario del Demandado.
A la vista de ello, el Experto considera que concurre claramente mala fe en el registro y uso del nombre de
dominio en disputa y que esta conducta resulta claramente subsumible en la circunstancia acreditativa de la
mala fe incluida en el apartado (iv) del párrafo 4(b) de la Política:
“(iv) si, al utilizar el nombre de dominio, usted ha intentado de manera intencionada atraer, con ánimo de
lucro, a usuarios de Internet a su sitio web o a otro sitio en línea, creando confusión con la marca del
demandante en cuanto al origen, patrocinio, afiliación o promoción de su sitio web o su sitio en línea o de un
producto o servicio en su sitio web o sitio en línea.”
...
2022-07-18 - Case Details
The Parties
Complainant is Volkswagen AG, Germany, represented by Gołębiowska Krawczyk Roszkowski i Partnerzy Kancelaria Adwokacko-Radcowska Sp. p., Poland.
Respondent is Andre Machado, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is , which is registered with AC Webconnecting N.V. ...
2020-11-17 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847). Access to the disputed domain name was already restricted due to concerns that it was being used to conduct a phishing scam at the time the present Complaint was filed. ...
2020-11-10 - Case Details
Complainant had more than USD 42 billion in sales in 2019, is a member of the S&P 500, and has more than 141,000 employees at facilities and offices in the United States and around the world.
...
2020-09-10 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggested affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; AB Electrolux v. Handi Sofian, Service Electrolux Lampung,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-10-20 - Case Details
Vale mencionar também que a Caterpillar Brasil LTDA é titular de 10 (dez) nomes de domínio “.br”
compostos pelos mesmos elementos nominativos “CAT” e “CATERPILLAR”, a saber: ;
; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; e ,
onde os dois últimos foram transferidos para a referida Reclamante em decorrência do caso Caterpillar
Inc., Caterpillar Brasil Ltda. v. A. d. P. F., Caso OMPI No. DBR2020-0014.
O Reclamado, por outro lado, é titular do nome de domínio em disputa ,
registrado perante o Nic.br em 10 de setembro de 2020. ...
2022-08-30 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that GILEAD is a well-known and famous brand, adding that it is a member of the S&P 500, employs 14,500 individuals worldwide, and has been the recipient of unsolicited news articles in publications such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post, as well as Internet sources, and other articles.
...
2021-11-10 - Case Details
First, based on the circumstances here, the Panel concludes that the Respondent’s registration and use of
the Disputed Domain Name had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its FACEBOOK Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-05-23 - Case Details
O nome de domínio em disputa, , excluída a terminação “.com.br”, incorpora porção substancial dos sinais anteriores da Reclamante, não tendo a substituição da última letra “p” pela letra “i” o condão de afastar uma associação indevida com os direitos anteriores da Reclamante.
...
2021-07-08 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc., United States of America, represented by Vedder Price P. C., United States of America.
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / NCLEX Office, Cameroon.
2. ...
2021-06-04 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
For these reasons, this Panel finds that Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name has been in bad faith.
7. ...
2021-06-09 - Case Details
Section 3.5 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states that “[p]articularly with respect to ‘automatically’ generated pay-per-click links, panels have held that a respondent cannot disclaim responsibility for content appearing on the website associated with its domain name (nor would such links ipso facto vest the respondent with rights or legitimate interests)”. ...
2021-05-28 - Case Details
The Respondents’ registration and use of the Disputed Domain Names indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainants and the JADED LONDON Mark (or at least the dominant portion of the mark). See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”). ...
2021-05-26 - Case Details
Softech Ltd., DNS Administrator (gold),
WIPO Case No. D2007-1699; and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323].
The addition of the generic Top-Level-Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” to the disputed domain name constitutes a technical requirement of the Domain Name System (“DNS”), and therefore has no legal significance in the present case (see CARACOLITO S SAS v. ...
2021-07-20 - Case Details
Such use of a domain name based on Complainant’s GILEAD Mark for no conceivable purpose other than to promote activity unauthorized by Complainant and to trade upon the goodwill associated with Complainant is not a legitimate use. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; see also eSpeed Government Securities, Inc. and Aqua Securities, L.P. v. aqua-securities,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-12-28 - Case Details