Segundo o art. 1o da Resolução CGI.br/RES/2008/008/P do Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, via de regra, um nome de domínio disponível para registro é concedido ao primeiro requerente que satisfaz, quando do requerimento, as exigências para o registro do mesmo. ...
2021-02-19 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name, which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.5).
...
2021-01-27 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
For these reasons, this Panel finds that Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain names were in bad faith, pursuant to paragraph 4(b) of the Policy.
7. ...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
See section 1.8 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”). “[P]unctuation changes such as hyphens are de minimis when analyzing a domain name for identity or confusing similarity under the Policy.” ...
2021-02-09 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name that intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; Philip Morris Incorporated v. ...
2019-02-15 - Case Details
Complainant further argues that when a Disputed Domain Name incorporates an entire trademark with only the addition of the gTLD “.info”, it is still confusingly similar to the trademark as the addition of a gTLD extension like “.info” does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. See F. Hoffmann-LaRoche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc. v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2018-09-25 - Case Details
Lorna Kang a/k/a Yong Li a/k/a Mahmoud Nadim a/k/a The Data in Bulkregister.com's WHOIS Database is p a/k/a Amjad Kausar,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0635 and General Electric Company v. Marketing Total S.A,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-09-14 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is Valextra S.p.A. of Milan, Italy, represented by Bugnion S. p. A, Italy.
The Respondent is Crystal International of Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Megazone. ...
2018-07-23 - Case Details
Lianfa,
WIPO Case No. DPW2014-0003; L’Oréal v. Vitaly P Pak,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0291; L’Oréal v. Wen Tao,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0521; L’Oreal v. Rampe Purda / Privacy--Protect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-10-24 - Case Details
Complainant argues that the entirety of the ASIANET Mark is incorporated into the Disputed Domain Name. See, Hoffmann-LaRoche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc. v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2018-10-24 - Case Details
Complainant further argues that when a Disputed Domain Name incorporates an entire trademark and that the addition of non-distinctive letters like a typo or the gTLD “.com” does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. See, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2018-11-07 - Case Details
Andrea Picaro,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0881 and GA Modefine S.A. v. Sparco P/L,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0419.
3 Access made on September 5, 2017. See section 4.8 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”). ...
2017-09-25 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the Respondent is fraudulently trading on the goodwill established by the Complainant in its registered marks and intentionally attempting to mislead consumers and cites Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847.
The Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith:
The Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered on June 16, 2017, in the name of Emmanuel Dube, domiciled in Johannesburg, South Africa. ...
2017-12-26 - Case Details
Ludwig Manfred Jacob
005347505
November 6, 2007
5, 10, 32, 44
CH
DR. JACOB'S
Dr. Ludwig Manfred Jacob
P-565675
December 13,
2007
5, 10, 32, 44
NO, PH, TR,
US, AT, BX,
CN, CZ, EG,
ES, FR, HR,
HU, IR, IT,
MA, PL, RO, RU, SI, US
DR. ...
2017-12-19 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:
- The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the MARLBORO Trademark because, inter alia, "[p]ast Panels have consistently held that a disputed domain name that consists merely of a complainant's trademark and an additional term that closely relates to and describes that complainant's business is confusingly similar to that complainant's trademarks"; and "[b]y appending the term 'get' in front of Complainant's MARLBORO® trademark, Respondent has created a domain name which would lead unsuspecting Internet users to believe the domain is associated with a website where they would be able to purchase, acquire, or otherwise 'get' products related to the MARLBORO® brand...
2017-11-14 - Case Details
Covex Farma S.L.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1379; and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847. However, while a Texas certificate confers fewer presumptive rights than would a valid service mark registration, the Panel does not find that the Respondent has filed for said certificate solely to deflect potential UDRP proceedings against him. ...
2017-09-13 - Case Details
In determining if the Respondent has legitimate interests to the disputed domain name, the Panel agrees with the panel in Schleich GmbH v. P. Schellens, Cosch BV, Case No. DEU2017-0005, that the principles from Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-19 - Case Details
Furthermore, use which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, Philip Morris Incorporated v. ...
2019-01-08 - Case Details
At the same time the Complainant’s LEGO Trademark is undisputedly a well-known mark that has been also confirmed by previous Panels, see. e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. Admin Hostmaster,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1474. ...
2018-12-28 - Case Details
See WIPO Overview 3.0, Sections 2.13.1; 2.13.2 (“Panels have categorically held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (e.g., … phishing, … impersonation/passing off, or other types of fraud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a respondent…. [P]anels have found that circumstantial evidence can support a complainant’s otherwise credible claim of illegal respondent activity….”). ...
2018-12-26 - Case Details