is a classic case of typosquatting, as the disputed domain name is a slight misspelling of Complainant’s trademark. Here, other than adding the gTLD...“.com” the only difference between Complainant’s mark and the disputed domain name is Respondent’s replacing the final “o” with an “e.” 4 Typosquatting is...
2010-12-17 - Case Details
Respondent is engaged in “typosquatting”, a practice which consists of a registration which is only a slight variation of a legitimate mark. The Complainant...makes the very same arguments for the other two Disputed Domain Names which contain a mistaken letter which constitutes this same “typosquatting” and the...
2010-07-27 - Case Details
Names are clear instances of typosquatting. The Domain Names are almost identical to the Complainant’s trademark. The Respondent is a well-known...cybersquatter with a long pattern and practice of typosquatting on well-known trademarks. Moreover, the Respondent has chosen to conceal its true identity through...
2021-12-21 - Case Details
constitutes “typosquatting” and is fraudulent so that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply...by the evidence of the Respondent’s “typosquatting” activities, which constitute prima facie evidence of confusion as it demonstrates an intent on the...
2021-03-31 - Case Details
mark apart from the misspelling of the middle “i” for an “l”. The Complainant submits that this misspelling amounts to typosquatting and that on a QWERTY...amounts to a case of typosquatting which is illegitimate and in circumstances that the disputed domain name is being used to host a fraudulent email address...
2020-10-19 - Case Details
names containing the words “heaven hill” or possible “typosquatting” variations of it. The disputed domain name was registered on April 1, 2020. Little is...domain name is an example of bad faith typosquatting and that it is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The Complainant further confirms...
2020-06-23 - Case Details
of the Domain Name. On the contrary, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent by registering the Domain Name is engaged in “typosquatting” and...the Complainant’s MICHELIN trademark registrations predate the registration date of the Domain Name. The Domain Name constitutes a typosquatting variant...
2022-01-28 - Case Details
Mark and that such “typosquatting” is evidence of bad faith under the Policy 4(a)(iii). Lastly, Complainant claims that Respondent has engaged in a...WIPO Case No. D2008-1302 (“Such insignificant modifications to trademarks is commonly referred to as ‘typosquatting’ or ‘typo-piracy,’ as such conduct...
2022-08-30 - Case Details
the mark the prefix ‘www-’, which, in the opinion of the Complainant, is a commonly used typosquatting method considered in several cases under the...domain names’ parking sites represents use in bad faith of the disputed domain names, • the typosquatting which characterizes the two disputed domain names...
2004-12-08 - Case Details
typosquatting. “[B]ad faith under the UDRP is broadly understood to occur where a respondent takes unfair advantage of or otherwise abuses a complainant’s mark...letters “g” and “p”, with a plural additive, in the disputed domain name is clearly an example of typosquatting, which many panels have found to be evidence...
2022-12-28 - Case Details
Complainant’s logo POPULOUS on its website “www.populous.com”. The Complainant compares the case at hand to so-called “typosquatting” cases where the respondent...Complainant refers to previous UDRP decisions which state that “typosquatting” is a strong indication for a confusing similarity, the lack of rights or...
2014-07-15 - Case Details
Complainant has rights; and -The Respondent engaged in typosquatting by using the Complainant’s CLARINS Mark and omitting the letter “l”; and - The Respondent...the Respondent has engaged in typosquatting, a practice by which “a registrant introduces slight deviations into famous marks” for commercial gain...
2014-05-08 - Case Details
Disputed Domain Names are all confusingly similar to the Trade Mark. All but one of the Disputed Domain Names are common typosquatting mistakes, which is...Trade Mark, bad faith can be presumed. Further, it is well established under the Policy that typosquatting constitutes bad faith registration. It is...
2015-10-29 - Case Details
Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name “is intentionally designed to cause deception” through the practice of typosquatting. Rights and Legitimate...Complainant’s website and directing them to the Respondent’s website through the practice of typosquatting; (iii) the Respondent has registered or acquired the...
2015-09-09 - Case Details
typosquatting. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, WIPO Case No. D2005-1190 . The practice of typosquatting intentionally takes advantage of Internet users...similar by design. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, supra (referring to intentional misspellings as "typosquatting", which "has consistently been...
2016-11-18 - Case Details
Internet users. The Disputed Domain Name is an example of soundsquatting, which is a form of typosquatting. It is well-settled that the practice of...typosquatting constitutes evidence of bad faith. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings To...
2018-05-01 - Case Details
the Complainant states that the Respondent has engaged in serial and systematic typosquatting with respect to other domains for financial gain, and...Complainant argues that the Respondent has engaged in a form of ‘typosquatting’, because the disputed domain name misspells the Complainant’s principal website...
2010-11-09 - Case Details
any confusion and is, in fact, a deceptive practice known as “typosquatting” which is done with the express purpose of causing confusion. (2) The...tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue. According to the Complaint, the Respondent’s behavior constitutes typosquatting by registering a domain name...
2011-12-22 - Case Details
to alleged “typosquatting”, unauthorized use for commercial purposes, initial interest confusion, “cash parking”, and Respondent’s alleged numerous...long and extensive use demonstrate that Complainant has rights in the MERCK mark. Complainant asserts that this is a case of “typosquatting...
2010-09-02 - Case Details
Respondent maliciously and intentionally registered the Disputed Domain Name for typosquatting by misspelling the word TECHNOLOGIES to read as...Complainant’s trademark, being a common mistake that any Internet user can make. This is a clear example of typosquatting. As section 1.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0...
2021-04-20 - Case Details