Propiedad intelectual Formación en PI Respeto por la PI Divulgación de la PI La PI para... La PI y… La PI en… Información sobre patentes y tecnología Información sobre marcas Información sobre diseños industriales Información sobre las indicaciones geográficas Información sobre las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Recursos de PI Informes sobre PI Protección por patente Protección de las marcas Protección de diseños industriales Protección de las indicaciones geográficas Protección de las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Solución de controversias en materia de PI Soluciones operativas para las oficinas de PI Pagar por servicios de PI Negociación y toma de decisiones Cooperación para el desarrollo Apoyo a la innovación Colaboraciones público-privadas Herramientas y servicios de IA La Organización Trabajar con la OMPI Rendición de cuentas Patentes Marcas Diseños industriales Indicaciones geográficas Derecho de autor Secretos comerciales Academia de la OMPI Talleres y seminarios Observancia de la PI WIPO ALERT Sensibilizar Día Mundial de la PI Revista de la OMPI Casos prácticos y casos de éxito Novedades sobre la PI Premios de la OMPI Empresas Universidades Pueblos indígenas Judicatura Recursos genéticos, conocimientos tradicionales y expresiones culturales tradicionales Economía Financiación Activos intangibles Igualdad de género Salud mundial Cambio climático Política de competencia Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Tecnologías de vanguardia Aplicaciones móviles Deportes Turismo PATENTSCOPE Análisis de patentes Clasificación Internacional de Patentes ARDI - Investigación para la innovación ASPI - Información especializada sobre patentes Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas Madrid Monitor Base de datos Artículo 6ter Express Clasificación de Niza Clasificación de Viena Base Mundial de Datos sobre Dibujos y Modelos Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Internacionales Base de datos Hague Express Clasificación de Locarno Base de datos Lisbon Express Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas para indicaciones geográficas Base de datos de variedades vegetales PLUTO Base de datos GENIE Tratados administrados por la OMPI WIPO Lex: leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Normas técnicas de la OMPI Estadísticas de PI WIPO Pearl (terminología) Publicaciones de la OMPI Perfiles nacionales sobre PI Centro de Conocimiento de la OMPI Informes de la OMPI sobre tendencias tecnológicas Índice Mundial de Innovación Informe mundial sobre la propiedad intelectual PCT - El sistema internacional de patentes ePCT Budapest - El Sistema internacional de depósito de microorganismos Madrid - El sistema internacional de marcas eMadrid Artículo 6ter (escudos de armas, banderas, emblemas de Estado) La Haya - Sistema internacional de diseños eHague Lisboa - Sistema internacional de indicaciones geográficas eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediación Arbitraje Determinación de expertos Disputas sobre nombres de dominio Acceso centralizado a la búsqueda y el examen (CASE) Servicio de acceso digital (DAS) WIPO Pay Cuenta corriente en la OMPI Asambleas de la OMPI Comités permanentes Calendario de reuniones WIPO Webcast Documentos oficiales de la OMPI Agenda para el Desarrollo Asistencia técnica Instituciones de formación en PI Apoyo para COVID-19 Estrategias nacionales de PI Asesoramiento sobre políticas y legislación Centro de cooperación Centros de apoyo a la tecnología y la innovación (CATI) Transferencia de tecnología Programa de Asistencia a los Inventores (PAI) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED de la OMPI Consorcio de Libros Accesibles Consorcio de la OMPI para los Creadores WIPO Translate Conversión de voz a texto Asistente de clasificación Estados miembros Observadores Director general Actividades por unidad Oficinas en el exterior Ofertas de empleo Adquisiciones Resultados y presupuesto Información financiera Supervisión
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Leyes Tratados Sentencias Consultar por jurisdicción

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX020-j

Atrás

Intellectual Property High Court of the Republic of Korea [2023]: Case No. 2022 Na 2357

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 8: Court Referred Mediation Mechanisms Available for Intellectual Property Disputes

Intellectual Property High Court of the Republic of Korea [2023]: Case No. 2022 Na 2367

Date of judgment: June 26, 2023
Issuing authority: Intellectual Property High Court of Korea, Twenty-Second Division
Level of the issuing authority: Appellate Instance
Type of procedure: Judicial (Civin( �br> Subject matter: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); Trademarks; Enforcement of IP and Related Laws
Plaintiff: Park
Defendant: Kim
Keywords: Mediation, Conciliation, Decision in Lieu of Mediation, Trademark infringement

Basic facts: The dispute involved use of the below marks:

During their marriage, the plaintiff and defendant ran a retail shop for bags, wallets, shoes, female clothing, etc., using a trademark registered under the plaintiff’s name. The plaintiff initiated the trademark dispute upon the parties’ divorce.

The plaintiff, as the trademark holder, demanded that the defendant refrain from indicating, exhibiting, or publishing the registered trademark on any advertisements, internet websites, domain names, sign boards, or marks on services including internet shopping mall businesses, internet retail sales of bags and wallets, internet retail sales of female shoes, internet retail sales of female clothing, internet retail sales of female nail stickers, etc. He also claimed the equivalent of approximately 1 million US dollars in damages caused by the defendant’s use of the mark without his permission. The defendant argued that the trademark should belong to her, because she created and began using the mark. She contended that when the parties started the joint business, her then-husband, the plaintiff, registered the mark under his name without her consent. She continued to use the mark for her own business after the parties divorced.

The case was first heard by the Seoul Central District Court. The District Court found that the defendant had agreed to transfer her whole rights to the mark to the plaintiff (her then-husband) before registering the mark under his sole name. Therefore, the District Court ruled that the right to the trademark legally belongs to the plaintiff. The Court granted the plaintiff injunctive relief and damages of about 40,000 US dollars. On appeal to the Intellectual Property High Court, the plaintiff amended his claim, demanding that, in addition to not using the relevant marks for any of the designated services, the defendant pay the plaintiff approximately 300,000 US dollars per annum as damages until the termination of the contested acts.

The defendant appealed the District Court’s decision, demanding that the plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed in its entirety.

After having an oral argument at a hearing, each party agreed to proceed to the court-referred mediation process. The bench designated one judge of the panel as a mediator for the case. During the mediation, each party was able to understand each other’s position more clearly and sought diverse ways to settle, but the parties could not reach a final voluntary agreement. Thus, as a mediator, the judge issued a recommendation for each party through a Decision in Lieu of Mediation.

Decision: The defendant shall not use the marks for the prohibited services and shall pay the plaintiff a total of KRW 80 million (about 61,000 US dollars) in two installments. The defendant shall not use any of the plaintiff’s marks for any designated services. The plaintiff, upon receiving the above-mentioned money from the defendant, agreed to cancel the collateral of KRW 60 million (about 46,000 US dollars) deposited by the defendant with an officer of the Seoul Central District Court, as well as waive its right of appeal.

Neither party filed an appeal within two weeks of the date of service of the decision; thus, the decision has come to have the same effect as a settlement in a trial (i.e., the same effect as a final judgment).

Relevant holdings in relation to court referred mediation mechanisms available for intellectual property disputes: Under the terms of the above decision, the plaintiff shall no longer raise any further issues regarding the defendant’s use of the marks that occurred prior to the confirmation date of the decision, and the plaintiff shall waive the remaining claims in this case. Further, the plaintiff “does not wish to punish the defendant for the infringement of marks” in a case before the Seoul Central Prosecutor’s Office.

Relevant legislation:
Judicial Conciliation of Civil Disputes Act (Act No. 4202, 1990), available at
https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=52915&type=part&key=8

Practice Directions for Civil Appellate Trial in the Patent Court of Korea (2018), available at
https://patent.scourt.go.kr/dcboard/new/EngDcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=13&gubun=547 &cbub_code=&scode_kname=%C6%AF%C7%E3%BF%B5%B9%AE- Announcements&searchWord=&pageIndex=1