À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX035-j

Retour

Intellectual Property Court of Portugal [2022]: Barata & Ramilo, S.A. v Fabulous Cipher, Lda., Vila Nova Carneiro, S.A. and Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário, S.A.

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 2: Emerging Issues in Industrial Designs

Intellectual Property Court of Portugal [2022]: Barata & Ramilo, S.A. v Fabulous Cipher, Lda., Vila Nova Carneiro, S.A. and Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário, S.A.

Date of judgment: March 29, 2022
Issuing authority: Intellectual Property Court of Portugal
Level of the issuing authority: First Instance (National competence)
Type of procedure: Judicial (Civin( �br> Subject matter: Industrial Designs; Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights); Competition; Enforcement of Community designs; Unfair competition (trade dress)
Plaintiff: Barata & Ramilo, S.A.
Defendants: Fabulous Cipher, Lda., Vila Nova Carneiro, S.A. and Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário, S.A.
Keywords: Enforcement, Community designs, Copyright, Infringement, Unfair competition, Trade dress

Basic facts: The plaintiff is a market leader in the distribution and sale of fashion accessories such as costume jewelry, bags, leather goods and footwear. It operates, by itself or through franchisees, a network of 634 establishments worldwide, of which 126 are in Portugal, where the first shop was opened in 1994 in the northern city of Porto. On September 25, 2015, the plaintiff opened a new PARFOIS store at the Mar Shopping mall in the northern city of Matosinhos, with a new image concept known as the “V6 concept”, commissioned from the Spanish company Tribeka Estudio Y Diseño, S.L. and finalized between July and August 2015. The V6 concept was subsequently implemented in 12 other stores in Portugal, plus a number of other stores in Spain, Italy, France, Saudi Arabia, Hungary, Poland and Estonia.

The plaintiff is a market leader in the distribution and sale of fashion accessories such as costume jewelry, bags, leather goods and footwear. It operates, by itself or through franchisees, a network of 634 establishments worldwide, of which 126 are in Portugal, where the first shop was opened in 1994 in the northern city of Porto. On September 25, 2015, the plaintiff opened a new PARFOIS store at the Mar Shopping mall in the northern city of Matosinhos, with a new image concept known as the “V6 concept”, commissioned from the Spanish company Tribeka Estudio Y Diseño, S.L. and finalized between July and August 2015. The V6 concept was subsequently implemented in 12 other stores in Portugal, plus a number of other stores in Spain, Italy, France, Saudi Arabia, Hungary, Poland and Estonia.

The first store of the new accessories business under the VILANOVA brand was opened to the public by defendant Fabulous Cipher, Lda. on March 11, 2016, at the 8a Avenida shopping center in the northern town of São João da Madeira. The design concept makes use of predominantly light colors, especially in large areas such as the floor and walls; the wallpaper is light and textured; the shelves designed by the RAAD architecture studio are bottomless and minimalist; the lighting is a light gray spot track type that can be directed to illuminate areas where products are placed; and other decorative and exhibition elements purchased by catalog from suppliers of this type of material are used. In the subsequent seven months, the defendant opened another eleven VILANOVA accessories stores in several cities, mainly in the north of the country (some of which are pictured below).

On the eve of the opening of VILANOVA’s first shop, on March 10, 2016, the plaintiff applied for registration of Community designs No. 3023381-0001, 3023381-0004 and 3023381-0006, which are registered in its name with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) since that date for “ornamentation and decoration of [commercial] stores” in class 32.00 of the Locarno Classification.

On June 22, 2016, the defendant filed with the EUIPO for the declaration of invalidity of the plaintiff’s aforesaid Community designs.

In September 2016, the plaintiff filed an action before the Intellectual Property Court, claiming infringement of the said Community designs and of its copyright in the new V6 concept of the PARFOIS stores, as well as unfair competition on the part of the defendants.

On September 25, 2017, the court decided to stay the proceedings until the final decision was issued on the requests for invalidity of the Community designs pending before the EUIPO.

By decisions of October 6 and 27, 2017, the EUIPO rejected the requests for invalidity of the Community designs in question. The defendant filed appeals against the EUIPO decisions rejecting its requests for invalidity of the designs, but the appeals were dismissed by the EUIPO Boards of Appeal through decisions of March 26 and July 23, 2019, following which the proceedings resumed before the Intellectual Property Court and judgment was rendered afterthe final hearing.

Held: The court dismissed all claims regarding infringement of the plaintiff’s copyright and Community designs No. 3023381-0001, 3023381-0004 and 3023381-0006, as well as unfair competition practice, finding that there was no risk of confusion between the plaintiff’s and the defendants’ shops.

Relevant holdings in relation to emerging issues in industrial designs: In reaching its decision, the Court ruled on a number of issues relating to the distinctive criteria for design and copyright protection, including the following:

1. The assessment of “overall impression” for infringement purposes is the same as for validity purposes;

2. Similarities in the features that are expected to be commonplace in the relevant type of commercial space are disregarded in the assessment; and

3. The burden of proof to establish copyright protection in PARFOIS’s new store image, or in the allegedly infringing reproduction, lay on the plaintiff and was not satisfied in this case.

Relevant legislation:

Articles 3(a), 4(1), 5(2), 19(1) and 27(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community Designs

Articles 1, 175(1), 175(2), 193(1), 193(2) and 311(1)(a) of the Portuguese Industrial Property Code (Decree-Law No. 110/2018 of December 10, 2018)

Articles 1(1), 2(1)(i), 11, 14(1), 14(2), 19(1), 27(1), 27(2), 40(b), 44, 56, 67(1) and 68(2)(i) of the Portuguese Code of Copyright and Related Rights (Decree-Law No. 63/85 of March 14, 1985)