Die Gesuchstellerin ist Inhaberin mehrerer Schweizer Marken. Als Hauptmarke fungiert heute die Wortmarke Nr. P-485104 HOMEGATE, welche am 23. März 2001 beim Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum hinterlegt und anschliessend auch eingetragen wurde mit Schutz in den Waren und Dienstleistungsklassen 9, 14, 28, 35, 36, 41, 42. ...Bestand von Kennzeichenrechten
Wie oben erwähnt, ist die Gesuchstellerin die Besitzerin der Schweizer Wortmarke Nr. P-485104 HOMEGATE, die am 23. März 2001 hinterlegt worden ist. In ihrer Beilage 10 hat die Gesuchstellerin eine Kopie des vom Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum ausgestellten Markenzertifikates beigefügt. ...
2011-12-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
G&P Net S.p.A. v. Shawshank Trade
Case No. D2012-0153
1. The Parties
The Complainant is G&P Net S.p.A. of Altopascio, Lucca, Italy, represented by Società Italiana Brevetti, Italy.
...
2012-03-22 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the parties that an administrative panel was going to be appointed on June 20, 2011.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on June 27, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Panel orders in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 4, 2011...
2011-07-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on July 19, 2010.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on July 26, 2010. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Name, be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 29, 2010...
2010-08-09 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on August 28, 2007.
The Center appointed Thomas P. Pinansky as the sole panelist in this matter on September 14, 2007. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
Thomas P. Pinansky
Sole Panelist
Dated: September 28, 2007...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
Respondent owns and operates a fragrance store under
the name A&P Fragrances. On September 17, 2005, Respondent registered the
domain name . Respondent’s web site was initially
used in a way that directly competed with Complainant’s business by selling
fragrances to Internet consumers. ...D2000-0270
(June 6, 2000).
Respondent operates as A&P Fragrances and has not, until recently, held
itself to be associated with the mark PERFUMENIA. The first time Respondent
used “Perfumenia” was in its registration for the disputed domain
name. ...
2006-05-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE
PANEL DECISION
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Xrt Services P/L
Case No. D2006-0410
1. The Parties
The Complainant is F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
The Respondent is Xrt Services P/L, Xrt Services, Bunall, Australia.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names , ,
, and
are all registered with RegisterFly.com, Inc.
3. ...
2006-06-19 - Case Details
Juli 2006 beim Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum als Erweiterung der älteren Marke COMPARIS Nr. P-472823 (registriert am 25. November1999, Schutzverlängerung bis 25. November 2019) hinterlegt und anschliessend auch eingetragen wurde.
...Sie macht geltend, dass der Gesuchsgegner den Domain-Namen absichtlich so gewählt habe, um Internet-User aufgrund eines einfachen Tippfehlers (die Buchstaben “o” und “p” liegen auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander) auf dessen Website zu leiten und so vom guten Ruf und dem Erfolg der Gesuchstellerin zu profitieren.
...
2014-03-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
DECISÃO DO PAINEL ADMINISTRATIVO
DOCTISSIMO v. P. A. M.
Caso No. DBR2014-0016
1. As Partes
A Reclamante é DOCTISSIMO, de Levallois Perret, França, representada por Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema Moreira, Brasil.
O Reclamado é P. A. M., de São Paulo, Brasil.
2. O Nome de Domínio e a Unidade de Registro
O nome de domínio em disputa é , o qual está registrado perante o NIC.br.
3. ...
2015-02-11 - Case Details
BnB, the Respondent in that case, was allegedly an
agent of Respondent Dissertationdoctors.com and Dissertation-doctors.com. Complaint,
p. 7.
Complainant alleges that Respondent had not made any use of the domain names at issue before March 27, 2001, the date Complainant’s service mark registration issued. ...However, Complainant alleges that Respondent has used the domain names at issue to "offer[] to write book reports, essays, research papers, dissertations and term papers for others who are willing to pay a set fee and who then turn the work in as their own." Complaint, p. 6.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant contends that Respondent has registered domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to the service mark registered and used by Complainant, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain names at issue, and that Respondent has registered and is using the domain names at issue in bad faith.
...
2003-07-10 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lundbergs Produkter i Nyköping AB v. P D S
Case No. D2003-0730
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Lundbergs Produkter i Nyköping AB,of Sweden, represented by Mr. Jan Sjöbeck, Groth & Co. KB, of Sweden.
The Respondent is P D S, of Stockholm, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...
2003-11-24 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Mesirow Financial, Inc. v. Tatjana P. Kolpakova
Case No. D2013-1448
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Mesirow Financial, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois, United States of America (“US”), represented by Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, US.
The Respondent is Tatjana P. Kolpakova of Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER (the “Registrar”).
3. ...
2013-11-21 - Case Details
The Panel is therefore satisfied that Complainant has provided sufficient prima facie evidence that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name.
Complainant also contends “[P]arked pages comprising PPC links [do] not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill of the complainant’s mark”.
...Prior UDRP panels have consistently held that respondents that monetize domain names using PPC links targeting the complainant, have not made a bona fide offering of goods or services that would give rise to rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name and, therefore, Respondent is not using the Disputed Domain Name to provide a bona fide offering of goods or services as allowed under Policy. paragraph 4(c)(i), nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use as allowed under Policy, paragraph 4(c)(iii).
Section 2.9 of WIPO Overview 3.0 provides:
“[P]anels have found that the use of a domain name to host a parked page comprising PPC links does not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill of the complainant’s mark or otherwise mislead Internet users.” ...
2020-05-13 - Case Details
Francis Raynald Grenier
and Cadmos LLC, WIPO Case No. D2002-0049,
at p. 5; Monty and Pat Roberts, Inc. v. Bill Keith, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0299, at p. 9; Migros Genossenschaftsbund v. Centro Consulenze
Kim Paloschi, WIPO Case No. D2000-1171,
at p. 5; Women on Waves Foundation v. Chris Hoffman, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1608, at p. 4. If the true motive is to operate a web site
providing information about the Complainant or a discussion forum on the Complainant’s
activities, the Respondents could easily have, and should have, chosen a domain
name which would clearly indicate to users that this was not the Complainant’s
official web site but an unofficial web site containing information about the
Complainant and/or a discussion forum...
2002-08-23 - Case Details
This includes a requirement (in the Specification On Privacy And Proxy Registrations forming part of that agreement) that where a Registrar operates such a service it should disclose:
“The circumstances under which the P/P Provider will reveal and/or publish in the Registration Data Service (Whois) or equivalent service the P/P Customer's identity and/or contact data”;
(ii) The Rules were changed in respect of complaints submitted after July 31, 2015 so as to provide (at paragraph 4(b)) an express mechanism for the provision of information by a registrar. ...An example of one of the more blatant adopters of this business model, and who even went so far as to admit that his conduct amounted to extortion, is to be found in the decision in Little Acorns Fostering Ltd. v. W P, The Cloud Corp / Al Perkins,
WIPO Case No. D2017-1776.
6.23 It is also the case that many victims of this conduct will decide on a purely commercial and pragmatic basis to pay the sums sought. ...
2019-11-20 - Case Details
See WIPO Case No. D2000-0115 re tarzanonline.com, per Andrew P. Bridges.
4. Panelists may take "judicial notice" in appropriate circumstances in UDRP proceedings. ...Pike et al, Using the Internet, 2nd edition, Que Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, 1995, p. 686
13. See WIPO Case No. D2000-0594 re www-ge.com, per Hugues G. Richard.
14. See WIPO Case No. ...
2000-12-21 - Case Details
According to Research In Motion Limited, “a registrant that chooses to register through a privacy service and the registrar that provides such registration must bear some of the consequences of anonymous registration.” In Motion Limited, supra. at p. 5 citing F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. PrivacyProtect.org; Domain Admin and Mark Sergijenko,
WIPO Case No. ...Class
(Int’l)
DATE OF REGISTRATION
COUNTRY
ABB (AND DESIGN)
P-360.303
1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 17.
January 27, 1998
Switzerland
ABB
P-360.773
1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 17.
...
2010-12-15 - Case Details
Basically, the following factors were considered (see BGer 4A_128/2012, 07.08.2012, "Vogue"; BGE 128 III 146 "Audi"; BGE 124 III 277 "Nike"; BGE 116 II 463 "Coca Cola"; BGE 130 III 748, "Nestlé"; Philippe Gilliéron, in: Jacques de Werra (Ed.), Marques notoires et de haute renommée / Famous and Famous Trademarks, Zurich 2011, p. 37-72; Gregor Bühler, Protection of famous trademarks, in: IP Value 2007, Homburger, p. 230-232):
- the trademark’s high level of recognition in the Swiss public,
- its strength in advertising,
- its important financial value in different fields, and
- its distinctiveness and uniqueness.
...According to Swiss case law, a percentage of more than 50% of the Swiss population must know the trademark in order for the latter to qualify as being "well known" (Philippe Gilliéron, l.c., N 30; BGer 4C.31/2004, 08.11.2004 c. 3.3; sic! 2005 p. 200, 201: for example public awareness of the trademark RIESEN of 46% across the country was deemed to be insufficient by the Swiss Federal Tribunal). ...
2012-12-05 - Case Details
On February 20, 2008, the Complainant sent an email communication to the Center regarding, inter alia, that Respondent’s Korean language Response not be taken into account, or in the alternative, that an English language translation be ordered prior to rendering a Decision.
The Center appointed Thomas P. Pinansky as the sole panelist in this matter on February 28, 2008. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Thomas P. Pinansky
Sole Panelist
Dated: March 17, 2008...
2008-03-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises
Case No. D2009-0170
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
The Respondent is P N S Enterprises of Key West, Florida, United States of America.
2. The disputed domain names and Registrar
The disputed domain names and are registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...
2009-04-09 - Case Details