About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Communiqué on an Amendment to the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for Authorization of the Competition Board, and on Abolition of Communiqués No. 1997/2 and 1997/6; Communiqué No. 2006/2, Türkiye

Back
Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2006 Dates Entry into force: March 9, 2006 Adopted: March 2, 2006 Type of Text Other Texts Subject Matter Competition

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Communiqué on an Amendment to the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for Authorization of the Competition Board, and on Abolition of Communiqués No. 1997/2 and 1997/6; Communiqué No. 2006/2         Turkish 1997/1 sayılı Rekabet Kurulundan Izin Alınması Gereken Birleşme ve Devralmalar Hakkında Tebliğde Değişiklik Yapılması ile 1997/2 ve 1997/6 sayılı Tebliğlerin Yürürlükten Kaldırılmasına Dair Tebliğ (Tebliğ No. 2006/2)        
 Communiqué on an Amendment to the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board, and on the Abolition of the Communiqués No. 1997/2 and 1997/6; Communiqué No. 2006/2

Communiqué

From the Presidency of the Competition Authority:

Communiqué on an Amendment to the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board, and

on the Abolition of the Communiqués No. 1997/2 and 1997/6; Communiqué No. 2006/2

Communiqué No. 2006/2

ARTICLE 1- Article 5 paragraph six of the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board,

published in the Official Gazette dated 12/8/1997 and numbered 23078 has been

amended as follows.

“A merger or an acquisition shall not legally become valid until a decision,

either explicitly under Article 10 paragraph one of the Act, or tacitly under paragraph

two of the same article, is taken on the notification duly made pursuant to Article 5 of

this Communiqué. In case the notification is deemed as not having been made,

Article 11 of the Act shall be applied.”

The following paragraph seven has been added to follow paragraph six of the

same article.

“In case merger or acquisition operations subject to authorization are realized

without the authorization of the Competition Board, fine shall be applied in

accordance with article 16 paragraph one sub-paragraph (c) of the Act. In case the

fine mentioned in this sub-paragraph is applied on associations or associations of

undertakings having legal personality, natural persons employed in managerial

bodies shall also be fined personally up to ten percent of the fine imposed.”

1

ARTICLE 2- Article 8 of the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board has been

amended as follows.

“ARTICLE 8- Should the Competition Board concludes, as a result of the

examination of a notification made pursuant to this Communiqué, that the operation

notified is not a merger or an acquisition, it may consider this notification as an

application for negative clearance pursuant to Article 8 of the Act, or as an

application for exemption under Article 5 of the Act.”

ARTICLE 3- Article 9 of the Communiqué No. 1997/1 on the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board has been

amended as follows.

“ARTICLE 9- In cases where the decision by the Competition Board made

explicitly under Article 10 paragraph one of the Act, or tacitly under paragraph two of

the same article that a merger or an acquisition is not contrary to Article 7 of the Act

has been taken due to incorrect or misleading information by one of the

undertakings, or the obligations attached to the decision have not been fulfilled, the

Board may place the merger or acquisition under re-examination, and may decide on

prohibition and the application of the other sanctions.”

ARTICLE 4- The Communiqué of the Competition Board No. 1997/2 on the Procedures and Principles for the Notification of Agreements, Concerted Practices,

and Decisions by Associations of Undertakings Pursuant to Article 10 of the Act,

published in the Official Gazette dated 12/08/1997 and numbered 23078, and its

annex Form-1 together with the Communiqué No. 1997/6 on the Rights and

Obligations of Undertakings and Associations of Undertakings Arising from the Act

No. 4054 after the Conclusion of the Organization of the Competition Authority,

published in the Official Gazette dated 11/11/1997 and numbered 23167 have been

abolished.

ARTICLE 5- This Communiqué shall enter into force on the date it is published.

2

ARTICLE 6- The provisions of this Communiqué shall be executed by the President of the Competition Authority.

3

 1997/1 Sayili Rekabet Kurulundan Izin Alinmasi Gereken Birlesme ve Devralmalar Hakkinda Tebligde Degisiklik Yapilmasi ile 1997/2 ve 1997/6 Sayili Tebliglerin Yürürlükten Kaldirilmasina Dair Teblig (Teblig No: 2006/2)

1

Rekabet Kurumu Başkanlığından:

1997/1 Sayılı Rekabet Kurulundan İzin Alınması Gereken Birleşme ve Devralmalar Hakkında Tebliğde Değişiklik Yapılması ile 1997/2 ve

1997/6 Sayılı Tebliğlerin Yürürlükten Kaldırılmasına Dair Tebliğ

Tebliğ No: 2006/2

MADDE 1- 12/8/1997 tarihli ve 23078 sayılı Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan 1997/1 sayılı Rekabet Kurulundan İzin Alınması Gereken Birleşme ve Devralmalar Hakkında Tebliğ’in 5 inci maddesinin altıncı fıkrası aşağıdaki şekilde değiştirilmiştir.

“ Bu Tebliğ’in 5 inci maddesine göre usulünce yapılmış olan bildirim hakkında Kanun’un 10 uncu maddesinin birinci fıkrası çerçevesinde açıkça veya aynı maddenin ikinci fıkrası çerçevesinde zımnen bir karar verilmeden önce birleşme veya devralma hukuken geçerlilik kazanamaz. Bildirimin yapılmamış sayılması halinde Kanun’un 11 inci maddesi uygulanır.”

Aynı maddenin altıncı fıkrasından sonra gelmek üzere aşağıdaki yedinci fıkra eklenmiştir.

“İzne tabi birleşme veya devralma işlemlerinin Rekabet Kurulunun izni olmaksızın gerçekleştirilmesi halinde Kanun’un 16 ncı maddesinin birinci fıkrasının (c) bendi uyarınca para cezası uygulanır. Tüzel kişiliği olan teşebbüs veya teşebbüs birliklerine bu bentte belirtilen para cezasının uygulanması halinde, yönetim organlarında görev alan gerçek kişilere de şahsen, verilen cezanın yüzde onuna kadar ayrıca para cezası uygulanır.”

MADDE 2- 1997/1 sayılı Rekabet Kurulundan İzin Alınması Gereken Birleşme ve Devralmalar Hakkında Tebliğ’in 8 inci maddesi aşağıdaki şekilde değiştirilmiştir.

“MADDE 8- Bu Tebliğe göre yapılmış olan bir bildirimin incelenmesi sonucunda Rekabet Kurulu bildirilen işlemin birleşme veya devralma olmadığı sonucuna ulaşırsa, bu bildirimi Kanun’un 8 inci maddesine göre menfi tespit başvurusu veya Kanun’un 5 inci maddesi çerçevesinde muafiyet başvurusu olarak değerlendirebilir.”

MADDE 3- 1997/1 sayılı Rekabet Kurulundan İzin Alınması Gereken Birleşme ve Devralmalar Hakkında Tebliğ’in 9 uncu maddesi aşağıdaki şekilde değiştirilmiştir.

“MADDE 9- Rekabet Kurulu’nun Kanun’un 10 uncu maddesinin birinci fıkrası çerçevesinde açıkça veya aynı maddenin ikinci fıkrası çerçevesinde zımnen bir birleşme veya devralmanın Kanun’un 7 nci maddesine aykırı olmadığına ilişkin vermiş olduğu kararın, teşebbüslerden biri tarafından verilmiş olan yanlış veya yanıltıcı bilgi nedeniyle alınmış olduğu ya da karara eklenmiş olan yükümlülüklerin yerine getirilmemiş olması hallerinde Kurul, birleşme veya devralmayı yeniden incelemeye alarak yasaklamaya ve diğer yaptırımların uygulanmasına karar verebilir.”

2

MADDE 4- 12/08/1997 tarihli ve 23078 sayılı Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan 1997/2 sayılı Anlaşmaların, Uyumlu Eylemler ve Teşebbüs Birliği Kararlarının Kanunun 10 uncu Maddesine Göre Bildiriminin Usul ve Esasları Hakkında Rekabet Kurulu Tebliği ve ekindeki Form-1 ile 11/11/1997 tarihli ve 23167 sayılı Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan 1997/6 sayılı Rekabet Kurumu Teşkilatının Oluşturulmasından Sonra Teşebbüslerin ve Teşebbüs Birliklerinin 4054 Sayılı Kanun’dan Doğan Hak ve Yükümlülüklerine İlişkin Tebliğ yürürlükten kaldırılmıştır.

MADDE 5- Bu Tebliğ yayımı tarihinde yürürlüğe girer.

MADDE 6- Bu Tebliğ hükümlerini Rekabet Kurumu Başkanı yürütür.


Legislation Relates to (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s))
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. TR119