About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Customs Act (Act No. 119 of December 21, 2007, on Customs Duties and Movement of Goods) (Chapter 15) (as amended on July 1, 2013), Norway

Back
Superseded Text  Go to latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2013 Dates Adopted: December 21, 2007 Type of Text IP-related Laws Subject Matter Enforcement of IP and Related Laws, IP Regulatory Body Notes The notification by Norway to the WTO under article 63.2 of TRIPS states:
'[This Act provides] new provisions on enhanced enforcement of intellectual property rights by customs. It contains provisions on suspension of release, interlocutory injunctions, responsibility of right holders, etc.'

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Customs Act (Act No. 119 of December 21, 2007, on Customs Duties and Movement of Goods) (Chapter 15) (as amended on July 1, 2013)        
 Customs Act (Act No. 119 of December 21, 2007, on Customs Duties and Movement of Goods) (Chapter 15) (as amended on July 1, 2013)

Chapter 15 of the Act on Customs Duties and Movement of Goods

(Customs Act) of 21 December 2007 No. 119

Chapter 15 Detention of goods that violate intellectual property rights

Section 15­1 Notice and detention of goods prior to a preliminary order

(1) The customs authorities may, notwithstanding the duty of confidentiality, notify the

rightholder if there is reasonable suspicion that the importation or exportation of goods subject to

customs treatment will constitute an infringement of an intellectual property right as mentioned in the Dispute Act Section 28A­1 third paragraph first sentence. In addition to the grounds for the suspicion,

the notification shall also, insofar as this information is known to the customs authorities, state the

names and addresses of the sender and consignee, the origin of the goods, and the nature and number of the goods. The customs authorities may detain the goods for up to ten working days reckoned from

the date notification was given.

(2) The consignee or its representative shall be notified when the customs authorities notify

the rightholder or detain goods pursuant to subsection (1).

(3) This chapter applies correspondingly to the importation or exportation of goods that violate

the Marketing Control Act Section 30, and to the importation or exportation of goods that violate the

Marketing Control Act Sections 25 and 26, when the violation consists of copying another person's

product, distinguishing mark, advertising materials or other produced items.

(4) The ministry may issue regulations to the effect that rights holders shall be encouraged to

give the customs authorities information with a view to uncovering goods as mentioned in the first paragraph, and about who is to be notified on behalf of the rightholder.

Section 15­2 Preliminary order

(1) Preliminary orders to protect intellectual property rights pursuant to section 34­7 of the

Civil Disputes Act shall state what goods the customs authorities are to detain and for how long the

customs authorities shall seek to identify such goods. The court shall notify the customs authorities of

any preliminary order. If the plaintiff is ordered to furnish the owner or consignee of the goods with

security for possible compensatory damages, the customs authorities shall only be informed once the plaintiff has furnished such security. In its notification the court shall include any additional

information about the goods of which it is aware and which can help the customs authorities to

identify goods which are to be detained. (2) Where the customs authorities have received notification from the district court requiring

them to withhold specified goods from release, the customs authorities shall seek to identify such

goods that are received for customs treatment. (3) The Ministry may make regulations concerning the customs authorities’ control of goods

that are to be detained to protect intellectual property rights pursuant to this section.

Section 15­3 Notification etc. in the event of detention of goods

(1) Where the customs authorities have identified goods that are to be detained on the basis of

a preliminary order, they shall immediately notify the district court, the plaintiff, the consignee of the

goods and, if applicable, the person who represents the consignee vis­à­vis the customs authorities, or

who has charge of the goods upon importation on behalf of the consignee. The notification shall state

that the goods are detained in accordance with the preliminary order until the court or the plaintiff

decides otherwise, or the court sends word that the measure has been lifted with final and legally enforceable effect or has lapsed. The notification to the plaintiff shall, insofar as it is available to the

customs authorities, also contain information about the consignor, the consignee and the goods as

mentioned in Section 15­1 first paragraph second sentence. (2) When the court receives notification from the customs authorities pursuant to the first

paragraph, it shall immediately set a short time limit for the plaintiff to bring action against the

consignee of the goods regarding the claim that the preliminary order is intended to protect, unless the

1

court has already set such a time limit. If the preliminary order has been decided without an oral

hearing being convened, the consignee of the goods and any other person affected by the preliminary

order may request a subsequent oral hearing pursuant to the Dispute Act Section 32­8.

(3) The customs authorities may upon request order that the rightholder, the consignee or its representative shall be entitled, at the customs authorities' premises, to examine goods detained

pursuant to Section 15­1 first paragraph, or on the basis of a preliminary order. The customs

authorities may also decide that examples of such goods shall be handed over to the rightholder for examination. Goods handed over to the rightholder shall be returned as soon as the examination is

complete or the detention has lapsed. The rightholder is responsible for any damage to the goods that

arises in connection with examinations pursuant to this subsection. (4) The Ministry may issue regulations concerning the customs authorities’ notification of

measures to protect intellectual property rights pursuant to this section.

Section 15­4 Declaration, responsibility for storage dues, the destruction of goods etc.

(1) The detention of goods by the customs authorities pursuant to Section 15­1 first paragraph

or on the basis of a preliminary order in no way affects the duty to declare the goods and to pay

customs duties and charges. The rightholder is liable for the cost of storage dues during the period the goods are detained pursuant to Section 15­1 first paragraph or on the basis of a preliminary order, and

shall be notified in accordance with the Tax Payment Act Section 14­10 second paragraph, in the same

way as the consignee for the goods, before the goods can be subject to enforced sale because of failure to pay storage dues.

(2) Goods may not be forcibly sold pursuant to Sections 4­2, 4­27 and 4­32 as long as they are

detained pursuant to Section 15­1 first paragraph or on the basis of a preliminary order. The same

applies if it is confirmed by a judgment or it follows from a binding agreement between the

rightholder and the consignee or its representative that the goods constitute an infringement of an

intellectual property right.

(3) The customs authorities may arrange for the destruction of goods that are detained, or take

other measures concerning the goods, when this follows from a judgment or when the consignee or its

representative has consented to this. The rightholder is liable in relation to the customs authorities for

costs incurred by the customs authorities in connection with the destruction of goods or other measures concerning the goods.

Section 15­5 Lifting and lapse of a preliminary order (1) Where the court lifts a preliminary order or adopts a decision to the effect that the order

has lapsed, it shall inform the customs authorities thereof once the decision is legally enforceable. In

cases as mentioned in section 34­6 of the Civil Disputes Act the customs authorities may request the

court to make a decision to the effect that the order has lapsed.

(2) The Ministry may make regulations concerning the lifting and lapse of preliminary orders

pursuant to this section.

2


Legislation Relates to (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s)) Is superseded by (2 text(s)) Is superseded by (2 text(s)) WTO Document Reference
IP/N/1/NOR/13
IP/N/1/NOR/E/2
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. NO130