关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

2022年产权组织知识产权法官论坛

22FORUM015-j

返回

Session 3: Constitutional Court of South Africa [2022]: Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2022] ZACC 33

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2022 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

Session 3:  Copyright and New Technologies

Constitutional Court of South Africa [2022]:  Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition and Others [2022] ZACC 33

Date of judgment:  September 21, 2022

Issuing authority:  Constitutional Court of South Africa

Level of the issuing authority:  Final Instance

Subject matter:  Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights)

Plaintiff:  Blind SA

Defendants:  Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, the President of the Republic of South Africa.

Keywords:  Unconstitutional provisions, infringement of the rights of persons with visual and print disabilities, accessible formats.

Basic Facts:  The Plaintiff, is a non-profit organisation working for the benefit of blind people in South Africa.

 

The Copyright Act grants the copyright owner the exclusive right to do or authorise the reproduction or adaptation of their literary works (requirement of authorisation).

 

The Plaintiff contended that the Copyright Act restricts the availability of works under copyright in formats accessible to persons with print and visual disabilities, and therefore, unfairly discriminates against them.  After undue delays in the legislative process to amend the Copyright Act, the Plaintiff filed for a declaratory order from the High Court of South Africa on the unconstitutionality of the Copyright.  

 

The High Court, on December 7, 2021, affirmed the unconstitutionality of the Copyright Act to the extent that it: (a) limits and/or prevents persons with visual and print disabilities from accessing works under copyright that persons without such disabilities are able to access; and (b) does not include provisions designed to ensure that persons with visual and print disabilities are able to access works under copyright in the manner contemplated by the Marrakesh Treaty.

 

Held:  The Constitutional Court of South Africa (“the Court”) confirmed the High Court of South Africa decision on the constitutional invalidity of sections 6 and 7, read with section 13 of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978 for constituting unfair discrimination and violating the right of individuals with visual and print disabilities to dignity, freedom of expression, freedom to receive and impart information, to receive basic education and to participate in the cultural life of their choice, set out in sections 9(3), 10, 16(1)(b), 29(1) and 30 of the Constitution, by restricting the availability of literary works in adapted format copies.  

 

The Court held that the requirement of authorisation cannot be applied without regard to the impact of the requirement upon different classes of persons. To apply the requirement to all is to expose those with print and visual disabilities to the damaging scarcity of literary works. That constitutes unfair discrimination and hence the Copyright Act, to avoid this discrimination, must apply the requirement of authorisation with due regard to the differential effect of the requirement upon those with print and visual disabilities.

 

The Court ordered interim relief including additional provisions to Section 13 of the Copyright Act for accessible format copies under “Section 13A Exceptions applicable to beneficiary persons”.

 

Relevant holdings in relation to copyright and new technologies: The Court noted that new technologies to adapt literary works into accessible format copies are being developed to provide tailored solutions to different impairments and should not be limited by copyright legislation against infringement.

 

The Court held that those who serve the interests of persons with print and visual disabilities should be given the greatest latitude to produce literary works in accessible format copies and to develop technologies to do so that are ever better at rendering the original work in the best possible way, tailored to the varied incidents of the impairments such persons suffer.

 

Relevant legislation:

 

Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled

Section 6, 7 and 23 of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978

Sections 9(3), 10, 16(1)(b), 29(1) and 30 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa